They Refuse to Live with Her Child – Now She Has NOWHERE to Go!

Buckle up, folks! We’ve got a juicy roommate tale that’s sure to get your blood boiling! Meet our protagonist, a 28-year-old gal living with her two besties, Amy and Chelsea. Everything was peachy keen until a little bundle of joy entered the picture… Amy’s 6-year-old son! With partial custody and weekly visits, the trio thought they had it all figured out. But wait, there’s more! Enter the dynamic duo of not-so-kid-friendly dogs, and you’ve got a recipe for disaster. As the plot thickens, Amy’s ex decides to join the military, leaving her with full custody of the little tyke. Now, our leading lady and Chelsea are faced with a tough decision…

Roomie Drama Alert!

Doggy Dilemma ‍♀️

️ Ex Joins the Military, Custody Chaos Ensues!

Confined Canines, Not Fair!

Lease Renewal Refusal ‍♀️

️ Homeless Accusations, But No Regrets?

Feeling Guilty, AITA? ‍♀️

Roommate Showdown: Kid vs. Dogs!

Well, well, well… looks like our gal and Chelsea are in quite the pickle! They’ve got two options: live with a small child full-time (yikes! ) or kick Amy to the curb (double yikes! ). Amy’s not making it easy, though, playing the blame game and calling them out for their not-so-kid-friendly pups. But hey, even without the dogs, living with a kid 24/7 wasn’t part of the deal! ‍♀️ Our protagonist feels bad, but is it really her responsibility? Let’s see what the internet has to say about this roommate showdown!

NTA gets to have a child-free lifestyle, roommate’s problem now

NTA, but mother blames you for HER problems

NTA comment refuses to live with child, suggests Amy work it out.

Choosing who you live with is your right. NTA

Roommate wants to bring child, NTA refuses, dogs at risk

Child-free living preferences respected, not responsible for friend’s child.

Choosing not to accommodate someone else is fair and justified.

Fair decision to not live with someone else’s child.

Agreed, NTA. Having a kid around full time was not agreed upon and guilt tripping is not okay

Being a mother means finding suitable accommodation for your child. NTA

Roommates not responsible for her housing. NTA

Setting boundaries with empathy. NTA is being reasonable.

Dog owners not responsible for accommodating child, commenter argues

Living with kids is a choice and it’s okay not to.

Don’t let her guilt-trip you. NTA for setting boundaries

NTA and prioritizing child’s safety, offer help in finding place

Being a young mother is tough, but blaming roommates isn’t right.

Don’t risk it all! Being homeless with a child is scary

Mother takes responsibility for child’s safety, roommates not obligated. NTA

Take care of your wellbeing. Don’t let her manipulate you.

NTA, not your kid not your problem.

A heartwarming story of coparenting and finding compatible roommates.

Roommate doesn’t want to take responsibility for a child ‍♂️ #NTA

No sympathy for ex-partner’s child, seeks military help ‍♀️

Clear NTA judgement, but empathy for her homelessness situation.

Protect your safe space; dogs’ comfort also matters!

Dog owners accept fault, leave to avoid conflict. NTA.

Single adults prefer child-free lives. Finding a flatmate is hard. NTA

Helpful advice for a struggling mother in a tough situation

Not her problem. NTA for not wanting to live with child

Choosing to not live with a child. NTA.

Mom admits she wouldn’t want to live with someone else’s kid. NTA.

Pets over kids? This commenter has some strong opinions

Supportive comment acknowledges difficult situation but upholds prior agreement.

Changing living arrangements made her TA, NTA comment wins

Choosing not to live with a child is understandable. NTA.

NTA puts her child’s safety first, Amy needs to prioritize.

No obligation to help. Perfect response

Roommate should have found kid-friendly accommodation a long time ago. NTA

Dog owner stands firm against guilt trip from homeless mom.

Standing up for yourself is always the right thing. NTA

NTA. You are not responsible for subsidizing Amy’s housing.

NTA. Roommates should agree on living situation. Dogs not kid-friendly.

Stand your ground and let them find their own place

Support for not wanting to live with a child, NTA.

Safety first! Commenter defends OP’s decision to protect kids and dogs.

Dogs vs Child – NTA prioritizes child’s safety

Choosing yourself over others is sometimes necessary.

Former roommate defends decision to not live with child ‍♀️

Parenting is hard and choices are tough. NTA here.

Empathetic NTA comment suggests moving on and setting boundaries.

Taking responsibility for your own child is important.

Boundaries respected. Friend being selfish, but not necessarily an a-hole.

Parent’s decision to live with unsuitable dogs raises eyebrows

Eight months’ notice and still NTA for not wanting kid around

Supportive comment, empathizing with the mother’s situation.

Encouraging advice on how to help a struggling friend

Having a backup plan is important, NTA suggests finding alternatives

Responsible NTA finds new home for herself and child

NTA. You have the right to remove Amy from the lease.

Standing up for yourself against guilt-tripping and unfairness

Dog safety concerns justify not living with child. NTA

No obligation to let her live there with a child. ‍♀️

Controversial comment sparks no replies in this section.

Entitled person thinks OP should’ve planned to live with child

Fulfill your contractual commitment – not responsible for each other.