Wedding bells are ringing, but not without some family drama! Meet our groom-to-be, a 32-year-old man caught between his bride’s severe dog allergy and his sister’s service dog. With the big day approaching, tensions are rising as the groom tries to navigate this tricky situation. Will he be able to find a solution that keeps everyone happy, or will this wedding turn into a dog-gone disaster? Let’s dive into this tail of love, loyalty, and a whole lot of sneezing!
A Wedding Dilemma: Sister’s Service Dog vs. Bride’s Allergy

Bride’s Traumatic Past with Dogs

Lockdown Blessing in Disguise

Sister’s Service Dog Dilemma

Groom Adores Service Dog, But…

Bride’s Comfort Comes First

Not Banning Service Dog Forever, Just for Wedding

Family Backlash: Groom Called an A-hole

Groom’s Ultimatum: No Service Dog at Wedding!
Our groom is facing a ruff situation! His bride-to-be, Gemma, has a severe dog allergy that leaves her face swollen and red, even with heavy makeup. But his sister Kate relies on her service dog Lenny to manage her diabetes. The groom adores Lenny but has put his paw down, insisting that Kate leave her furry friend at home for the big day. Kate argues that Lenny is a service animal and should be allowed, but the groom says his wife’s comfort comes first. Now, his family is calling him an a-hole and threatening to skip the wedding altogether! Talk about a dog-gone dilemma! Let’s see what the internet has to say about this hairy situation…
Bride’s allergy, sister’s service dog and a groom’s tough call

Prioritizing bride’s allergy over service dog, NTA according to commenter

Bride has right to allergy-free wedding, sister has alternative.

Dog-loving groom prioritizes bride’s allergy on their big day

NTA verdict turns sour when family threatens to boycott wedding

Bride’s health comes first. Sister can skip the wedding.

Balancing conflicting needs at different events is important. NTA

Bride’s allergies come first. NTA for banning service dog.

Supporting your partner and being considerate is always NTA

Groom defends banning sister’s service dog at wedding due to allergy

Bride’s allergy or sister’s convenience? NTA prioritizes wife’s health

A thoughtful response on accommodating disabilities at events.

Bride’s allergies come first. Sister and mom overreacting.

Bride’s comfort should come first, NTA for banning service dog

Assert your authority and give family a deadline for RSVPs.

Groom stands up for wife’s allergies, bans sister’s service dog

Weddings are about compromise. NTA prioritizes bride’s allergy needs.

Supportive comment, no replies. NTA for banning service dog.

Balancing health concerns of both sister and bride ❌

Sister expects bride to suffer for her service dog? Definitely NTA.

Bride’s comfort matters. Can they find a compromise?

Curious about the service the dog performs

Concerned commenter questions the logic of the groom’s decision

Bride’s allergies come first, sister’s wants second. NTA

Tough call, but bride’s health takes priority. NTA

Wife comes first, sister stays home – NTA

Sister’s stubbornness causes allergy drama at wedding

Managing without service animal for few hours. NTA.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/e6346172-448c-443f-ad2c-1b985f3b7814.png)
AI or not, dogs at weddings are a hot topic

NTA. Bride’s health matters more and sister seems vindictive ♂️

Being NTA doesn’t guarantee dog-free wedding

Groom faces backlash for banning sister’s service dog at wedding

Sister has viable alternatives but chooses to be a**hole

Doubting the severity of the allergy and calling out rage bait.

Sister’s allergy vs service dog – NTA’s accommodating solution

Managing diabetes without service dog for one day is reasonable.

Having a backup plan for a service dog is important. NTA.

User defends groom’s decision to ban service dog at wedding.

Stand up guy defends bride’s allergy, sister acts like toddler

Wedding day trumps sister’s service dog allergies. NTA

Controversial comment on service dogs at weddings

Wedding rules: respect the bride’s allergy or stay home

Disabled person defends bride’s allergy and suggests alternative for service dog.

Defending allergic fiance from entitled sister’s banned service dog

Allergies can turn into anaphylaxis, NTA took it seriously

Managing a diabetic condition without a service dog is doable. NTA.

Managing diabetes without service dog: a Type 1 diabetic’s solution

NTA. Diabetes doesn’t always need a service dog
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/caf11035-aa73-49a0-a2d7-39bd8b73ab35.png)
Using a CGM for diabetes is not a spectacle, NTA.

Bride’s allergy is a good enough reason to ban service dog

Insensitive comment about a diabetic’s service dog

Sister’s service dog banned from wedding due to allergy . Compromise or stay home?

Debate on the necessity of diabetes dogs for diabetics.

Empathy over family? NTA for banning sister’s service dog

Sister’s medical condition doesn’t trump bride’s allergy. Good riddance. ♂️

Sister’s service dog banned from wedding due to bride’s allergy, NTA
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/83f71811-36ce-463a-8a8b-b4e6c14aac8f.png)
NTA. The sister’s service dog can’t attend a private wedding.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/2c948b29-3ff6-4886-b0d8-044e599c8894.png)
Choosing between sister and wife, not a hard decision.

Controversial comment dismisses service dog needs, sparks no replies.

Debunking the myth of service animals having free reign

Service dog or medical equipment? Tricky situation for sure

User argues against banning service dog at wedding, suggests alternatives

Suggests a thoughtful solution to accommodate sister’s service dog ban

Poster defends banning service dog at wedding, suggests social media post. NTA.

Insensitive comment suggests violent solution to service dog allergy.

Service dogs for diabetes have many benefits beyond just being cool.

Respectful decision. Health of fiancé comes first. Family may react.

Rare allergy or not, NTA for banning dog at wedding

Service dogs for diabetes? Interesting! NTA for prioritizing bride’s health.

Controversy over service dog at wedding sparks debate on necessity

Prioritizing safety over service animals, a reasonable decision

Debate on service dogs at private events sparks controversy

User questions necessity of service dog at wedding.

NTA OP. Uninvite sister to avoid ruining wife’s wedding day

Sister’s diabetes and service dog banned from wedding, unbelievable
