Picture this: you marry the love of your life, who comes from a different religious background than you. You both decide to ditch religion and focus on your love, but when your first child is born, the in-laws just can’t let go of their traditions. In this story, our hero and his wife are faced with a dilemma involving their baby boy’s… well, private parts. The in-laws are adamant about a certain religious practice, but our couple has other ideas. What happens when cultural differences collide and things get personal? Grab some popcorn, folks, because this family drama is about to unfold!
A Clash of Cultures

Our Baby Boy

Name Drama

An ‘American’ Name

Bris Talk ⏰

Decision Time

Agreement Reached ✅

Unwanted Guests

Diaper Drama

Time to Leave

Harsh or Fair?

Ultimatum ⚖️

Irrational Fears

The Ban

In-Laws, Out-Laws, and Baby’s Private Parts
Our hero and his wife find themselves in the middle of a family feud when their in-laws insist on a certain religious practice for their baby boy. The couple, both non-religious, stand their ground and refuse to give in to the pressure. However, things take a turn for the worse when the in-laws drop by for a surprise dinner and use a diaper change as an opportunity to criticize the couple’s decision. Our hero, fed up with the obsession over his child’s private parts, kicks them out and bans them from visiting until they promise to drop the issue. His wife is hesitant, fearing estrangement, but agrees that the situation is creepy and disrespectful. So, is our hero justified in his actions, or is he being too harsh? Let’s see what the internet thinks of this situation…
Parent defends decision against in-laws’ circumcision demands. NTA

Bold response shuts down in-laws’ circumcision demands

Setting boundaries with in-laws over circumcision

Mother stands firm against circumcision for her boys

Jewish commenter supports parents against in-laws’ circumcision demands

Individual regrets infant circumcision; supports new parents’ decision.

Grandparents want circumcision, parents say NTA, Reddit would agree

Man asserts his autonomy over his own body.

Jewish pediatrician explains circumcision is not medically necessary

Gen Xer regrets circumcision, supports new parents’ decision.

Choosing to circumcise should be a personal decision. NTA

Parental autonomy upheld against intrusive in-laws’ circumcision demands

NTA. Circumcision is mutilation and should be outlawed. In-laws, butt out.

Mother shares regret over circumcision decision and supports OP’s choice.

Body autonomy matters: NTA. Let men make that choice.

Passionate plea against male circumcision for infants

Respecting bodily autonomy: a crucial aspect of parenting

Circumcision is barbaric and illegal in advanced nations. NTA.

UK commenter supports not circumcising for religious reasons. NTA.

NTA stands firm against in-law’s circumcision demands, hygiene emphasized.

Standing up to in-laws for child’s well-being.

Setting boundaries is key for dealing with pushy in-laws

Reply suggests being upfront about cultural background, NTA judgement.

Suggesting a Brit shalom as a compromise

Protecting baby from unwanted circumcision and in-laws.

In-laws need to back off baby’s genitalia

Cutting off body parts for religious reasons is wrong. NTA.

Setting boundaries with in-laws over circumcision

New parents defend their decision against in-laws’ circumcision demands

Protecting son’s foreskin and hygiene is important, but NTA.

In-laws’ circumcision demand labeled creepy and borderline pedo

The irreversible damage of circumcision – a cautionary tale

Parent stands up to in-laws’ circumcision demands with logic

Suggest watching American Circumcision to educate in-laws

Parent shares son’s gratitude for choice to remain intact

Parent regrets circumcising son, supports not doing it to babies

Staring down in-laws over circumcision and name disputes

Let your son decide. NTA for standing firm

Let the person with the body part decide – NTA

Standing firm against in-laws’ circumcision demands is a human right.

Circumcision is unnecessary, causes pain, and diminishes sensitivity. NTA.

No medical benefit, no forced religious practices on our child.

Support for new parents standing against in-laws’ circumcision demands

NTA stands firm against in-laws’ circumcision demands

Culture should not justify harmful practices.

An interesting and dark Bible story about circumcision.

Relatable comment about pushy family members. NTA.

Join ‘circumcisiongrief’ subreddit for insight on resisting pressure.

NTA, let them go. Their demands are inappropriate and dangerous

Supportive comment on in-laws’ circumcision demands.

A Jewish atheist rejects circumcision without consent, supports new parents.

Jewish parents stand firm against in-laws’ circumcision demands

NTA stands against circumcision demands. Science favors his decision.

New parents threaten in-laws with legal action over circumcision.

A personal experience of circumcision’s impact on sensitivity and relationships ♂️

Giving infants bodily autonomy is important. NTA for refusing circumcision

New parents stand up to in-laws’ circumcision demands.

New parents defend decision to not circumcise son, call it genital mutilation

NTA stands up to in-laws’ circumcision demands

Respectful compromise suggested for in-laws’ circumcision demands.

New parents clap back at in-laws’ circumcision demands

Stand up to in-laws’ circumcision demand for YOUR child

Respectful grandma knows her boundaries, in-laws should too. NTA

Jewish commenter opposes circumcision, supports child’s choice. NTA.

Stand your ground and let him make the choice

Parents stand firm on circumcision, respecting their sons’ rights

Firmly setting boundaries with in-laws regarding circumcision ✌️

Grandparents need to accept intact penis and know how to clean

Parent stands up for son’s bodily autonomy against in-laws’ demands

Standing up for baby’s body autonomy. Good job!

Keeping baby intact is praised by commenter, no replies.

Support for parents standing up against in-laws’ circumcision demands

Be careful of in-laws’ intentions. They may go behind your back

A supportive NTA comment on circumcision with a personal story

New parents assert their stance against circumcision.

Let the child decide. NTA for standing firm.
