Buckle up, folks! We’ve got a juicy tale of love, commitment, and family drama that’s sure to get your blood boiling! Meet our leading lady, a fierce 45-year-old woman who’s been with her partner for a whopping 22 years. They’ve got three kids and a love that’s stood the test of time, but there’s just one little thing missing… a wedding ring! That’s right, this couple has decided to forgo the whole marriage thing, but that doesn’t stop them from using those sweet, sweet marital terms. Hubby and wifey, without the paperwork! But not everyone’s on board with their unconventional love story… ♀️
22 Years Together, No Wedding Bells
Marriage? No Thanks! ♀️
Hubby & Wifey, Without the Paperwork
Family Finds it Weird, But They Deal
Little Bro Ties the Knot
Dinner with the Newlyweds, Finally! ️
Sister-in-Law’s Shocking Accusation ️
I Couldn’t Help But Laugh
Things Got Heated, Fast
Hubby Says NBD, But I’m Not Backing Down ♀️
AITA for Sticking to My Guns?
Entitled Much?
Sister-in-Law Stirs Up Drama at Dinner!
Things took a turn for the worse when our leading lady’s sister-in-law decided to stir the pot at a family dinner. She accused our girl of being disrespectful for using marital terms without actually being married! The nerve! Our fierce lady couldn’t help but laugh at the audacity and pointed out that her relationship had lasted longer than the sister-in-law’s entire marriage! Things got heated fast, and the sister-in-law stormed out with her hubby in tow. Now, our leading lady is wondering if she’s the a-hole for sticking to her guns and continuing to use those marital terms, even though her partner says it’s no big deal. Let’s see what the internet has to say about this juicy drama!
RELATED STORIES
Insulting your host over marital terms? Definitely **NTA**
Sil calls out marriage, gets told off by commenter.
Is it ESH? Commenter thinks so. They acknowledge the SIL should mind her own business but also find the OP’s stance on marriage contradictory.
Defending the rights of creative nicknames. NTA wins!
Opinions divided on referring to partner as ‘husband/wife’. ESH.
SIL has a point: ‘Marriage’ isn’t just a term, it’s a commitment.
Defending the right to choose terms of endearment. ️
Getting married can have legal benefits, even without a ceremony.
Concerns raised about legal implications of non-marriage status.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/0a019e54-d137-4b91-893f-a59b29680e29.png)
Sister-in-law calls out woman for using marital terms without marriage
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/76d600cc-b4ed-409f-95a9-42739b99b955.png)
Being referred to as spouse without legal marriage is misleading.
Calling each other husband and wife is harmless, NTA
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/4d8fc7d0-b7c1-40f0-9c9b-afde7a025bc7.png)
Choosing not to use the terms ‘husband’ and ‘wife’. NTA.
User calls out OP for pretending to be married.
User calls out OP for using ‘marriage’ term.
Legal titles imply legal responsibilities. YTA but not for not getting married.
Critic says couple not married and should make wills.
ESH, but OP’s reaction was just as bad.
User questions woman’s desire to be called ‘wife’ without marriage
Using words differently can lead to negative reactions.
Being a wife without being a wife? Commenter says it’s foolish.
Who needs a piece of paper to validate 22 years of partnership? ♀️ #NTA
Marriage is more than just a legal document
User calls out OP for not abiding by marriage norms.
Why the commitment without the marriage? ESH for the unnecessary fight.
Denouncing marriage as a lie is a slap in the face
NTA, but could have handled it better. Sister-in-law being dramatic.
Paper or not, calling themselves husband and wife caused conflict ♀️
User agrees with OP and finds situation amusing
Using the term ‘marriage’ without wanting the contract spells double standards
User defends domestic partnership, deems it ‘weird but harmless’.
To marry or not to marry? ESH in this spicy exchange.
Sister-in-law calls out OP for falsely identifying as married. YTA.
Words have meaning. ESH, including partner’s SIL for overreacting.
User calls out deceitful language in ‘marriage’ labeling. YTA.
Marriage is more than paper and ceremony. NTA.
Plan ahead! NTA. Tragic story of a non-married couple’s aftermath.
Unmarried but not invalidated. NTA shut downs SIL’s attack.
Using a colloquial term for a long-term partner isn’t disrespectful.
Being called ‘wife’ is a pet name, not a role. NTA.
User questions logic of ‘pretending to be married’. NTA.
Don’t judge a woman’s marital preferences. Sister-in-law needs manners
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/a8f4b3e2-84ab-45f2-b9b6-fc5ce95bb46b.png)
Being called ‘wife’ is harmless pet name, NTA
Marriage isn’t just a status symbol. NTA for valuing love.
Curiosity about a couple’s 22-year ‘marriage’ sparks confusion and AH behavior.
NTA comment defends couple’s 22-year relationship against rude SIL.
The real benefits of marriage aren’t what you think
Mind your own business, SIL! NTA handled it well.
NTA defends ‘wifey/hubby’ terminology in non-married couples.
Legalities aside, use whatever term makes your marriage happy!
Gatekeeping marriage? Not cool. NTA, do what makes you happy!
Who cares what they call each other? NTA for sure!
NTA suggests getting legally married for asset and life support rights.
NTA explains how her friends have a successful non-legal marriage
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/d9bce60d-726d-4562-ab76-ec6848cd9664.png)
NTA defends the validity of their marriage.
Legal paperwork is crucial even if not getting married.
Mind your own business, SIL. NTA for using own terms
Using marriage-specific terms without getting married is odd, but NTA.
Being together for 22 years is like being married ❤️
Gatekeeping pet names? NTA shuts it down.
Defending the choice to use ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ after 22 years
NTA for SIL’s behavior, but why be referred to as wife without marriage?
Why should anyone care if you’re married or not?
Being together for 22 years is significant. NTA.
Claiming ownership of marital titles is ridiculous
Gatekeeping marriage? Not cool! NTA’s epic clapback wins
Validating lifelong commitment without a legal contract or ceremony.
Signing a piece of paper doesn’t define a ‘marriage’. NTA
Assertive comment defends right to define own relationship.
“Earn it??” SIL is full of it. NTA.
SIL says 22 years don’t make a wife/husband. Epic clapback!
Defending a 22-year marriage from SIL’s misguided attack
Live your life, you’re not hurting anyone. SIL has problem
NTA but SIL values marriage as a lifelong commitment
Choosing how to define a relationship is personal and valid.
Choosing unusual pet names, NTA commenter minds own business.
Calling your partner ‘husband/wife’ without marriage isn’t wrong.
Attorney warns of common law marriage, family out of control.
Importance of legal paperwork in relationships. ESH for guest rules.
User calls OP out for laziness and disrespect. Sister-in-law lacks tact.
Title misrepresents, SIL overreacted, but OP also at fault. ESH
Debating the paradox of wanting a marriage without the wedding
Sil insults woman’s relationship choice. Commenter agrees, adds confusion.
Calling each other husband and wife is juvenile but NTA.
Marriage vs Spouse: Is it necessary?
