Living arrangements can sometimes spark heated debates between couples. One husband found himself in the middle of such a debate when he insisted that his wife park her car 200 feet away from their garage, while his electric vehicle (EV) gets the prime spot. He claims that she agreed to this arrangement before they got the EV, but is it fair to make her walk that distance, especially when she leaves for work earlier than him? Let’s dive into the story and see what’s really going on. ♀️
The Townhouse Parking Situation ️
Wife’s Parking Options ️
Different Work Schedules ⏰
Prior Agreement
Safety and Weather Conditions
Shared Driveway
Financial Responsibility
Wife’s Car Mishaps
The Beloved Prius ❤️
Beat-Up Car Description
Husband’s Supportive Gesture ♂️
Commute Times
Not Trying to Flex
The Great Parking Debate: Who’s Right?
So, here’s the situation: a husband insists on parking his EV in their townhouse’s single garage spot, leaving his wife to park her beloved, beat-up Prius either in guest parking or 200 feet away on the street. She agreed to this arrangement before they bought the EV, but now some might question if it’s fair to make her walk that distance, especially when she leaves for work earlier than him. The husband claims it’s a safe neighborhood with well-lit streets, and he even walks her to her car when it’s not visible from their bedroom. But is this enough to justify the arrangement, or should they reconsider their parking priorities? Let’s see what people have to say about this situation… ♀️ ♀️
RELATED STORIES
Walking 200ft to park car? ESH, internet agrees ♀️
Defensive OP receives YTA judgement for parking dispute
Tesla owner called out for fake story on AITA subreddit
Husband prioritizes Tesla over wife’s convenience. YTA confirmed.
Marriage advice: Don’t insult your spouse’s car
A husband’s responsibility to ensure his wife’s safety
Tesla owner demands wife park far, called YTA. Ouch.
Calling out an obnoxious Tesla driver with a Ferrari complex
Keeping the expensive car in the garage is fair. NTA
User thinks OP is controlling, suggests compromise.
Curious comment raises valid points about Tesla owner’s situation.
Is it a valid concern or is there more to it?
Sharing is caring! NTA for wanting to trade off occasionally
Husband prioritizes car over wife’s comfort. YTA. ❌ ❤️
Redditor called out for defending car instead of wife’s feelings
Defending the Tesla owner: NTA for wanting to protect property
NTA for wanting to charge car in garage and safety concerns. But husband should walk wife to car for safety.
Safety concern raised for wife walking to car at night.
Sharing is caring, why not take turns driving the Tesla?
NTA for not letting wife park in garage, but not unreasonable.
Spouse values car over wife, YTA for overcompensating.
Sharing cars is a great solution , but calling for a new car is entitled
Tesla owner parks to charge, hybrid unplugs, NTA.
Agreement or not, leaving wife to walk is unfair
Logical NTA comment defends wife’s car charging parking spot
Wife parks car 200ft away, husband says NTA, suggests therapy
User questions Americans’ car dependency for 60m, 30s walk.
User calls out OP for being dismissive and defensive. YTA.
Walking is good for you! The world is laughing. NTA.
OP dodges question about sharing Tesla, verdict on parking unclear
Newer car in garage, wife parks 200ft away: NTA ♀️
Marriage is a partnership, YTA for using financial power
Husband’s $65k car vs wife’s $15k car, 200ft parking dispute
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/16e8267f-fc85-4c93-9de8-76e15f5d0862.png)
Marriage advice: always let your wife have the nicer car
NTA. Parking closer for charging is reasonable and practical
Parking scarcity is real, 60m is a luxury
Walking 200ft to charge an EV: NTA says commenter.
Agreement and logic prevail. NTA for parking decision.
EV owner suggests compromise for couple’s car charging dispute
Park expensive car in garage, NTA. Practicality over fairness.
Keeping expensive car in garage 200ft away is common sense
User defends husband, calls out misandry and entitlement in comments.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/8e8ef3cf-57a0-480b-978d-d3d65fa5b649.png)
Walking 200ft to park car not a big deal. NTA.
Spouse called out for not walking 200ft to park car ♀️
Making a 10-year agreement for exclusive garage use ⚡
User questions more info and suggests compromise, YTA verdict.
Woman expresses concern for her safety and calls out husband.
Walking 200ft to park is not unreasonable, NTA.
Protecting investments is reasonable, but compromise is important
Electric car owner defends parking decision, NTA.
Sharing responsibility for parking, NTA for 200ft walk
NAH. Tesla in garage for charging, wife’s car on street.
New car, new garage: NTA for making wife park outside
Why mentioning the car model in this context matters
Canadian calls out husband’s selfishness, predicts Tesla damage
Sharing the Tesla could be a loving compromise ❤️
Rich enough for a Tesla, but not a two-car garage
American male acknowledges wife’s anger but suggests walking her to car. NTA.
Tesla owner debates if making wife walk 200ft is a**hole move
Ex-wife shares experience of gender inequality in parking arrangements.
Alternate parking every other day to be fair
User calls out OP for lack of compromise and maturity
User calls out OP for being an AH and making a dumb financial decision by buying a Tesla, while also suggesting a compromise for the parking situation.
Mutual agreement is key, don’t force your spouse. ♀️
Backing into things and not owning the car? NTA for sure
Tesla bro gets called out for being the a**hole
