Imagine this: you’re tasked with delivering legal documents to someone who’s been evading them for some time. You finally track them down, only to find yourself in a heated argument with their roommates, who are trying to convince you that the person you’re looking for no longer exists. Sounds like a recipe for drama, right? Well, that’s exactly what happened in this wild story.
The Elusive Jane Doe ️♀️

Round Two: The Plot Thickens

The Vehicles Give Them Away

Confrontation Time! ⚡

A Heated Argument Erupts

The Shocking Revelation

Accusations of Bigotry

A Crucial Detail

A Dramatic Delivery: Who’s in the Wrong?
In a whirlwind of events, our legal document deliverer finds themselves in a heated argument with the roommates of the elusive Jane Doe. As the tension rises, it’s revealed that Jane is now John, having transitioned. Despite completing the delivery, the protagonist is later accused of being a bigot and insensitive for forcing the revelation of John’s ‘deadname’. But with conflicting stories and evasive behavior, who’s really in the wrong here? Let’s dive into the internet’s top responses to this dramatic showdown!
NTA. Serving legal documents is a reasonable exception to deadnaming.

NTA – Transitioning doesn’t give you a legal do-over

NTA: Commenter sympathizes with OP, calls out John Doe’s deception

Empathy deadzone? NTA! Legal name change needed for peace.

Unintentional mistake, but still not the a**hole.

Transitioning doesn’t erase legal issues. They can’t avoid responsibility.

NTA. They could have cleared up the confusion politely.

NTA, you were just doing your job. Not your fault

NTA. John’s lack of communication caused unnecessary confusion and frustration.

NTA for dealing with the pain of legal name change

Transgender disclosure: safety and security or invasion of privacy?

Trans man faces deadname reveal: NTA but power dynamics matter

Understanding the struggle of revealing a trans person’s ‘deadname’

NTA: Explaining my gender is exhausting, but necessary for clarity. They’re shady af.

Serving the correct person isn’t bigoted, it’s just your job!

Legal name change doesn’t always solve retroactive record issues.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/b6a03bf0-57e8-4a57-aaa6-3b65abc1e4ae.png)
NTA. Their legal name, their responsibility.

“NTA. As a trans man, it’s frustrating to use my deadname during medical procedures. It’s part of the game. “
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/6744218b-3e7d-4d07-9b34-1ef197a0ca5d.png)
NTA: Unfair to blame you for their difficult behavior

NTA: Trans man handles deadname situation with grace and assertiveness

NTA! How could you have known? ♂️

NTA: Transitioning to hide from legal trouble? Insulting to others.

Gender transition doesn’t absolve you of your responsibilities.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/6e7a583a-2de9-4949-85f5-aab240a18e27.png)
Trans man defends addressing someone by their deadname.

NTA calls out John Doe for using gender identity as leverage.

Trans man takes control of his identity and legal actions.

NTA: OP’s response suggests the landlord knew about the transition

Trans man stands up for himself, definitely not the a**hole!

NTA, you were not insensitive or a bigot in this situation!

NTA, legally required to reveal ‘deadname’. Their fault for evading.

NTA: They lied, so it’s their fault!
