Imagine a workplace tradition that suddenly becomes a source of contention. You’ve been part of a system where showing support through ‘condolence money’ envelopes is the norm. But what happens when you’re left out in the cold during your own time of need? This story isn’t just about money; it’s about fairness, support, and the emotional toll of feeling overlooked. Dive into this tale of office dynamics, personal loss, and a stand that sparked whispers in the hallways. ️
The Tradition of Condolence Cash

My Generous Contributions

Personal Loss Hits Home

A Barrier in Mourning

Feeling Overlooked

The Dilemma of Proof ❓

Refusing to Contribute

Confrontation with HR

A Clash of Perspectives ♂️

Standing My Ground ✊

The Ripple Effect

The Verdict? Office Solidarity or Solo Stand ♂️
So, there you have it, a tale of tradition, personal loss, and a bold stance that left the office buzzing. It’s more than just about the money; it’s about feeling valued and supported in times of grief. But was refusing to contribute the right move, or does it undermine the spirit of communal support? Let’s dive into the sea of opinions and see what the waves bring back. Who knows, maybe there’s more to this story than meets the eye.
NTA. Confidentiality clause? Bullying? This department needs HR intervention!

“No one should be guilt-tripped for not giving, or not giving ‘enough’.”

NTA: Shitty system, catty HR, and declining to donate money

Sending money for condolences sparks debate on cultural differences

YTA- No proof of death, bitter about someone else’s death

HR’s request for proof of death sparks controversy

HR’s requirement for a death certificate sparks controversy

NTA. Refusing condolence cash sparks controversy, but is it fair?

Prayer vs. Condolence Cash: A Spiritual Debate

Comparing the importance of relatives and questioning the condolence money

“Payment or Gift? Awkward HR Drama Sparks Controversy “
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/e278ba42-22ca-4c87-a289-ea6d3ff9d436.png)
Employees refuse condolence cash, sparks controversy. NTA, it’s messed up.

No one should be obligated to contribute to condolences. NTA

YTA for stopping contributions due to personal grievance. Be an adult

HR’s ridiculousness creates a hostile work environment. NTA

Anonymity and choice matter. HR crossed the line.

YTA. Workplace condolence cash sparks controversy. Unreasonable demand for leave.

HR defends their actions, citing lack of proof for condolences.

“YTA. Expecting money without meeting requirements? Inappropriate to ask.”

ESH: HR confronts about donation, but refusing out of pettiness.
