Imagine being invited to a family wedding, only to discover that the menu could potentially harm your child. This is the predicament one mother found herself in when she realized her son’s severe food allergies – eggs and shellfish – were the main ingredients in the wedding feast. Left with no alternative food options and an unyielding sister-in-law, she made the tough decision to skip the event, sparking a family feud.
The Allergy List: A Mother’s Nightmare
A Wedding Menu with a Sting
An Unyielding Sister-in-law
A Mother’s Dilemma
The Boy’s Verdict ♂️
A Family Feud Erupts
Accusations Fly ️
A Mother’s Stand ♀️
A Wedding Menu Controversy: Family Feud or Food Fiasco? ️
Caught between a rock and a hard place, our brave mother decides to prioritize her son’s health over family obligations. With the wedding menu posing a serious threat to her son’s life, she opts to stay home, causing a whirlwind of accusations and drama. The mother-in-law is furious, the sister-in-law feels victimized, and amidst all this, the mother stands her ground, refusing to risk her son’s life. Let’s see what the internet has to say about this complicated situation…
RELATED STORIES
Caterers should accommodate allergies, bride’s sister-in-law is power-hungry.
“NTA. I can’t believe the venue won’t accommodate allergies! “
NTA. Providing safe food is a basic event requirement.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/0caf3b02-45a2-4cd7-a2c6-20f223deda69.png)
NTA. SIL complains about ‘drama’ but won’t accommodate. MIL needs support.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/a1ac4bee-175f-4983-a13f-5b8ecd1bea31.png)
“Making something dangerous for one person is the same as uninviting them”
Mother-in-law causing drama over son’s allergies at wedding.
NTA: Family values son as a prop, not a person.
NTA for prioritizing your son’s safety, but what about the other kids?
NTA: Granny’s attendance isn’t crucial, let’s ease her worries!
NTA: SIL’s refusal to accommodate allergies, MIL’s archaic views.
NTA. Mother feels unappreciated by family, sparks interesting discussion.
NTA. Family forgot son’s allergies, risking his safety. Obvious oversight!
NTA. Stand your ground and demand accommodation for your son!
“NTA. Burn them all.”
NTA- Mother-in-law prioritizes money over grandson’s health. Family support lacking.
“NTA – Taking care of your son’s allergies is so important! “
Event manager supports mother’s decision to boycott wedding.
“NTA – In-laws don’t care enough to accommodate son’s allergies “
NTA: Easy fix for catering allergies, SIL didn’t even ask
SIL might be immature, stressed, and self-involved. NTA for boycotting.
NTA. Stand up for your child’s allergies and bring your own food!
NTA. Stand your ground and let MIL complain to SIL.
NTA: Kid shouldn’t starve at wedding. Venue rules or not?
Valuing family means accommodating allergies.
Mother boycotts wedding over son’s allergies. Is she justified?
