Imagine your teenage daughter walking home alone in the dark and cold because her school confiscated her phone, which had her bus ticket on it. That’s exactly what happened to Clem, a 17-year-old girl whose school recently changed its phone policy. The new rule states that confiscated phones will be held for four days, and guardians must come to collect them after school. However, Clem’s mom wasn’t having any of it, and she decided to fight the school’s policy. Let’s dive into this story and see if she’s a hero or a Karen.
The New Phone Policy
A Dangerous Walk Home
The Confiscation Incident
Mom Takes Action
A Compromise is Reached
Husband Calls Her a ‘Karen’
Clarifications and Updates
Lack of Communication
Mom’s Worries and Actions
Husband’s Apology
No School Change
No Taxi Option
The Confiscation Details ️♀️
Phone Policy Info
Mom Wins Battle Against School’s Phone Policy
Clem’s mom fought the school’s phone policy after her daughter had to walk home alone in the dark and cold because her phone, which had her bus ticket on it, was confiscated. The school agreed to give Clem her phone back after school so she could get home safely, but her husband called her a ‘Karen’ for her actions. Despite the lack of communication about the new policy and the dangerous situation it caused, Clem’s mom managed to reach a compromise with the school. Let’s see what the internet thinks of this situation…
RELATED STORIES
NTA. School’s phone policy puts kids at risk.
School’s phone policy questioned, NTA!
Mom fights school’s phone policy, sparks debate over child safety
NTA, fighting school’s phone policy and confiscation. Expensive property rights!
“NTA The school has no right to keep your property for 4 days. “
Demand change! Be a Karen and stand up for rights!
“NTA. School can’t keep my property overnight. Safety concerns urgent.”
“NTA this is a dumb rule and I bet you no one thought of the buses’ payment system when they came up with it. This is ridiculous. I don’t think you were a Karen either but if I were in your shoes, I would’ve gone full Karen on their a**es. You live *an hour and a half* away from the school, your daughter walked all the way home, and she didn’t have her phone to contact anyone in case of an emergency. This rule endangers students. Plus why the f**k are they not allowed to use their phones in the bathroom???”
Former teacher supports NTA, school’s phone policy questioned
NTA: Punishment outweighs crime. Theft of personal property and endangering students.
School’s phone policy: NTA fights back for student convenience!
NTA fights school’s phone policy for student safety. Husband admits a**hole behavior.
NTA. School’s phone policy puts daughter in unsafe situation.
NTA. School’s policy endangers daughter. Teacher is the real Karen
NTA. Sexist AF. Men calling women Karens for having opinions
School’s phone policy debated: NTA argues against confiscation after hours.
Outrage over school’s excessive phone confiscation policy sparks debate
NTA. Phones are essential and school’s punishment was excessive.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/25354a0a-3d00-47d1-b121-41f5f6c11c31.png)
NTA – Dangerous phone policy: burden or punishment?
NTA: School stole your property? Safety concerns support your argument!
Phone policy jeopardizes minors’ safety and access to essential information.
NTA fights for daughter’s safety, husband admits being ridiculous.
NTA fights school’s phone policy, demands change, protects kid
NTA. School’s dangerous phone policy changed thanks to you!
School phone policy criticized for keeping students’ phones overnight.
Phones: Necessary during school hours or after for safety/work/travel
Defending personal property: NTA fights school’s phone policy
Mom fights unsafe school policy, husband’s suggestion is revolting. NTA
NTA fights unsafe school policy, husband calls her Karen
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/0718d3ab-fd8c-4e40-8b6e-03f85e7fa79c.png)
