Man Refuses to Save More for Stepson than Future Child: Fair or Unfair?

Picture this: a couple in a loving relationship, living together with the woman’s son from a previous relationship. The man has been urging his girlfriend to save money for her son’s future for years, but she never followed through. Now, the girlfriend is pregnant with their mutual child, and the man plans to set up savings accounts for both children. However, his girlfriend wants him to compensate her son for the years of savings he missed out on. The man stands firm, refusing to contribute more to the stepson’s account. Is he being fair or unfair? Let’s dive into this emotionally charged story.

The Loving Family Setup

Full-Time Stepdad

Deadbeat Dad Alert ⚠️

The Savings Suggestion

The Financial Arrangement

Hoping for a Brighter Future

The Girlfriend’s Inaction

A New Baby on the Way!

Equal Savings for Both Kids

GF’s Compensation Request

Standing Firm on His Decision ✊

Equal Contributions Only

Context: Free Country Benefits

Savings for Luxuries, Not Necessities

Equal Savings or Making Up for Lost Time?

In this emotionally charged story, a man has been urging his girlfriend to save for her son’s future for years, but she never took action. Now, with a new baby on the way, the man plans to set up savings accounts for both children, contributing equal amounts. However, his girlfriend wants him to compensate her son for the years of savings he missed out on. The man stands firm, refusing to contribute more to the stepson’s account. Is he being fair or unfair? Let’s see what the internet has to say about this dilemma…

Fair and admirable approach to saving for both children.

Stepson receives equal treatment as future child. NTA

Stepson vs. Bio Child: Potential to Destroy Relationship

Contributed suggested amount, wife chose not to, NTA

Stepfather’s fair solution to save equally for all three children

OP defends decision not to save more for stepson. NTA

Questions raised about long-term financial plan for blended family.

NTA for prioritizing own child, girlfriend needs financial education.

Stepfather and mother both at fault for unequal savings accounts. ‍♂️

ESH for not saving for stepson, risking resentment from older child.

Stepson’s father figure suggests fair solution for savings discrepancy.

User thinks OP is not completely innocent in the situation.

Age gap drama in the comments

Stepson or not, splitting savings equally is fair. NTA

User calls out man for favoring future child over stepson

Man refuses to save more for stepson, expects 19yo to be mature

NTA commenter shares personal experience and supports fair treatment of both children.

Stepson deserves equal treatment, consider long-term impact.

Calling out questionable behavior and age gaps.

Supportive comment, applauding for saving for both kids.

NTA stands firm on stepson vs future child finances.

Stepmom defends not financially supporting stepson.

Wife’s lack of planning doesn’t make you TA.

NTA, but consider fixing the mistake for your son’s sake

NTA: Girlfriend’s entitlement over stepson’s savings is unfair.

Starting early and treating all kids equally. Good job!

NTA suggests fixed amount for stepson and future child.

Grandparent sets up accounts for grandkids, oldest gets less. NTA.

Fairness of saving for children discussed: action or goal oriented?

NTA suggests GF should seek child support for her child.

Sibling rivalry over college funds, but NTA prevails.

NTA for managing finances differently for stepson and future child

Why save for kids when they’ll just waste it?

Grandparent’s will sparked family feud, commenter relates to stepson’s situation. NTA

Starting college accounts for both kids, but not compensating interest.

Defending stepfather’s decision to not save more for stepson.

Equal savings for stepson and future child with freedom to choose.

Stepson deserves equal financial support, YTA for punishing him.

User calls out OP for lack of financial wisdom and stability

Love knows no DNA. Treat all kids equally.

Equal savings for both kids. NTA. Not your responsibility.

Equal savings for both stepson and son. NTA, fair decision.

Redditors deem OP TA for not saving equally for children

Setting up separate accounts for each child is reasonable

YTA for not treating stepson and future child equally

Stepson deserves equal treatment. Don’t play favorites.

Stepson is effectively your son, YTA for not saving for him.

Step parents unfairly blamed for bio-parents’ failings. NTA OP

Insensitive comment about single mothers.

Dad blames mom for not planning stepson’s future.

Stepson’s financial future not a priority for stepdad.

Stepfather praised for treating stepson and future child equally.

Treating both children equally, GF should have saved for son

Equal savings for both kids, NTA. Don’t back-pay for stepson.

Investing in a mutual fund can help your child’s future

Compromise suggested for stepson’s college fund, avoiding future resentment

NTA questions girlfriend’s maturity and age gap, refuses to save more.

Saving unequally for children can create sibling rifts.

Suggestion for a fair solution for both kids’ savings.

Stepson’s financial support causing tension. NTA for setting boundaries.

YTA for prioritizing bio kid over step kid. ‍♂️

Simplify the situation and give both kids the same amount.

Equal savings for both children, NTA. Communication is key.

Equal deposits for equal accounts, NTA according to commenter.

Equal savings for stepson and future child. NTA

NTA, but beware of potential jealousy between stepson and bio kid

Parental favoritism debated: Commenter says YTA for unequal savings distribution

NTA for not saving more for stepson, but be fair to future child

Saving equally for both children can prevent future drama.

Confusion and blame-shifting in financial decision-making.

Skip college savings, invest in K-12 private school education?

Stepson vs. Future Child: GF needs a reality check

Setting up accounts for both kids. NTA.

Stepson not entitled to more savings than future child. NTA