Man Refuses to Pay for Sisters’ Luxuries: Justified or Cruel?

Imagine working hard your whole life, only to watch your siblings get spoiled by your parents. That’s the story of a 31-year-old man who took over his father’s business after his dad fell ill. He’s now faced with a dilemma: should he continue to spoil his sisters like his father did, or teach them a lesson in self-reliance? The tension between him and his sisters is reaching a boiling point, and it’s time to find out if he’s in the right or just being a heartless brother.

Working with Dad Since 16 ️

Strict Dad, Spoiled Sisters

Dad’s Health Takes a Turn

Taking Over the Family Business

Sisters’ Luxurious Lifestyle

Self-Made Man

Married Sisters, Low-Paying Jobs

Sisters Demand Payments

Paying for College, but with Conditions

Relationship Strained

The Reasonable Sister

Family Gathering Showdown ️

Is He the Bad Guy?

To Spoil or Not to Spoil: A Brother’s Dilemma

After taking over his father’s business, our protagonist is faced with a tough decision: should he continue to spoil his sisters like his dad did, or teach them the value of hard work? While he’s willing to help them in times of need, he refuses to fund their luxurious lifestyles. This has led to a strained relationship with two of his sisters, while the youngest seems to understand his stance. The real question remains: is he being a responsible brother or just plain cruel? Let’s see what the internet has to say about this family drama.

NTA. Older sisters should be self-sufficient. Kudos for supporting youngest’s education.

Man’s sisters demand money for no reason: NTA.

Spoiling siblings led to cluelessness. NTA for stopping it.

NTA. Bank of dad closed, bank of big brother not taking business.

Retired dad can’t pay for luxuries, NTA sibling stands firm

NTA. You’re not their father and not responsible for them

NTA for refusing to financially support entitled sisters.

Commenter suggests cultural differences may explain disagreement.

Women should support themselves, NTA.

Generous gesture debated, but NTA for not supporting adult sisters ‍♂️

Family doesn’t entitle you to someone else’s money.

Support for NTA who bought dad’s business

Sibling drama: NTA refuses to fund sisters’ luxuries.

Company, money, rules. No need to pay for non-essentials. #NTA

Sisters’ entitlement questioned in inheritance dispute. NTA wins.

Family over money? NTA for not funding sisters’ luxuries.

Cultural differences impact family responsibilities. Luxury expenses not necessary.

NTA. Brother praised for not funding sisters’ luxuries.

Being a business owner doesn’t obligate you to provide luxuries. NTA

Commenter clarifies deal with parents and sisters’ situation.

NTA for not funding sisters’ luxuries. Interesting cultural background.

Being NTA comes with a warning: be careful what you offer

NTA – Brother refuses to pay for sisters’ luxuries

Brother refuses to pay for sisters’ luxuries. NTA, justified

Commenter questions OP’s motives in a sarcastic tone

Sibling entitlement? Not your problem. NTA

NTA refuses to fund sisters’ lavish lifestyle. Sisters refused to earn.

NTA stands up to entitled siblings. Arrested Development vibes

Commenter questions if the father’s intentions were communicated clearly

Not the a**hole, but why? Tell us more, commenter!

Commenter receives unanimous NTA support

Sibling favoritism sparks debate: NTA but pay for Amy?

Commenter supports disowning sexist family.

NTA prioritizes responsibilities, warns sisters of legal action if violated

NTA stands firm against entitled sisters.

Sibling money dispute: NTA for not financing sisters’ luxuries.

Sibling drama: Man refuses to pay for sisters’ luxuries. NTA.

Setting boundaries with entitled siblings: NTA

Expecting luxuries and divorces in entitled family

Stand your ground! Don’t let your sisters mooch off you.

Sibling financial support ends after college graduation.

Commenter defends OP and criticizes father’s parenting.

Prioritize new family and dire needs, NTA for not funding luxuries

NTA for not paying sisters to not work in business

NTA and beware of fake emergencies

Humorous NTA comment with no replies. Shenanigans avoided!

Sisters’ entitlement to business profits questioned.

Sibling money troubles: NTA, grades and husbands mentioned

NTA. Being generous with Amy’s college fund. They’re adults, not kids.

NTA – Brother’s decision to not pay for sisters’ luxuries.

Cutting off family’s money flow: NTA or cruel?

Empathetic NTA comment on sisters’ entitlement and financial advice.

Standards upheld: commenter is NTA

Sibling entitlement? Not the b******e for refusing to pay.

Sisters called entitled, commenter says they should get jobs.

Sibling support debate: Brother refuses to pay sisters’ luxuries. NTA.

New owner, new rules. Educated sisters acting entitled. Good job!

Commenter thinks man is not the a**hole.

Short and sweet: NTA

Agreement! Short and sweet

NTA – No explanation needed

Clear-cut judgment: NTA. But why?

Grownup refuses to pay for sisters’ luxuries. NTA.

NTA comment gets called out for random capitalization

Sisters should find jobs, not rely on brother. ‍ ✅

Heartwarming comment about being a father figure.

Sibling support or financial burden? NTA takes a stand.

Sibling entitlement denied: NTA stands firm, sisters must grow up.

Last Updated on June 4, 2023 by Diply Social Team