Working as a lifeguard at a waterpark can be a fun and rewarding job, but it also comes with its fair share of challenges and difficult decisions. One lifeguard found themselves in hot water after asking an overweight teenage girl to weigh herself before going down a waterslide. While the lifeguard’s intentions were focused on safety, the incident left the girl embarrassed and her parent fuming. Let’s dive into this slippery situation and see if the lifeguard’s actions were justified.
The Lifeguard’s Responsibility
The Weight Limit Dilemma ⚖️
Estimating Weight Issues
The Teenager’s Turn ♀️
Following Supervisor’s Instructions
Teen’s Snarky Response
The Weigh-In Results
Embarrassment and Regret
Supervisor’s Support
Parent’s Angry Email
Defending the Decision ️
Supervisor’s Continued Support
Reflecting on the Situation
Safety First or Feelings First?
The lifeguard’s predicament raises the question: should safety protocols be prioritized over the feelings of others? While the teenage girl was left embarrassed, the lifeguard was simply following the rules set by their supervisor to ensure everyone’s safety. The waterpark owner’s reaction and the angry email from the girl’s parent have left the lifeguard feeling like an a**hole, but their supervisor continues to support their decision. It’s a tough call, but let’s see what the internet has to say about this delicate situation…
RELATED STORIES
Weight policy sparks debate: safety vs. public humiliation. What’s the solution?
Weight check solution: weigh three people to avoid targeting individuals
Weight guessing is inaccurate and embarrassing. Weigh everyone for fairness
Weigh everyone or no one! NTA, just doing your job
NAH: Lifeguard’s weight check policy causes humiliation and inconvenience.
NTA. Lifeguard’s weight check for safety, not to be mean
Invisible numbers on the scale for a fair waterslide system
Weight discrepancy sparks controversy, possible malicious intent
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/5f1404de-f71e-43f1-93da-06f566c5fa38.png)
Lifeguard’s weight check policy causes uproar and self-image concerns
Weight check controversy: Lifeguard caught in a no-win situation
Safety first! Lifeguard handles weight check dilemma with tact
Weight limit incident on waterslide resolved without any conflicts
Safety first! Lifeguard avoids potential trouble by checking weight.
NTA. Weight policy sucks, but safety first, privacy matters.
Weight check incident sparks debate on privacy and sensitivity
NTA. Better safe than sorry
Lifeguard’s weight check sparks controversy. Was judgment call necessary?
NTA for enforcing safety measures, supervisor support is crucial
Scale solution: two readings – ride or can’t ride. Simple!
Lifeguard’s job: weight check uproar. NAH, it’s their responsibility
