Picture this: a lawyer, a courtroom, and a case of…babysitting gone wrong? ⚖️ That’s right, folks! Our story today revolves around a lawyer who was asked to babysit her neighbor’s 11-year-old daughter, Rhea. The lawyer, let’s call her ‘Justice Jane’, had a crucial virtual court hearing that day. She was assured by Rhea’s parents they would be back in time. But what happens when promises are broken, and a child is left to her own devices? Let’s dive into this unexpected drama…
A Simple Request

The Promise and the Deadline ⏰

The Unexpected Delay ⏳

The Virtual Courtroom ️⚖️

The Unexpected Surprise!

The Damage Report

The Parents Return

The Confrontation ⚖️

The Unexpected Reaction

The Counter Argument ️⚖️

The Legal Threat ⚖️

The Neighborhood Drama ️ ️

The Apology and the Resolution

The Final Decision

The Unexpected Verdict of the Living Room Courtroom! ⚖️
In this unexpected living room courtroom drama, Justice Jane found herself torn between her professional commitments and an impromptu babysitting job. When Rhea’s parents failed to return on time, a virtual court hearing and a curious 11-year-old led to a wardrobe disaster. The confrontation that followed saw accusations, threats, and a neighborhood divided. But in a surprising twist, an apology and a home-cooked meal brought a resolution to this unusual case. The final verdict? No more babysitting for Justice Jane! ⚖️
NTA. An 11 year old should know better, but were they late?

NTA: Babysitting at 11, but is this child poorly parented?

“NTA. Neighbors’ kid damaged your stuff, they won’t pay. Frustrating! “

Virtual courtroom drama: OP clarifies they didn’t leave the child.

NTA: Child’s age is old enough to know better. Lockdown concerns.

“NTA. Demand payment for damaged stuff. Never help them again.”

Virtual hearing saves the day! Netflix to the rescue!

NTA. Girl ruins personal items, no legal action, won’t babysit again.

“NTA. My 11-year-old is appalled. He regularly supervises himself. ⚖️”

NTA: They should have told you about their child’s needs

11-year-old destroys things despite clear instructions. NTA.

Extracting maximum compensation for broken agreement. No remorse. NTA!

Engaging comment and replies about a child’s behavior and needs
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/c899930e-63ad-438b-9c3c-5722921fc884.png)
11-year-old left alone, misbehaved. NTA, bill her parents!
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/a3bf7763-47c4-44d6-abf2-27a6e3154b24.png)
NTA! Parents should pay for damage.

Late parents, broken stuff – NTA wins the courtroom drama!

NTA – Parents pressed charges, but you gave them clear time ⏰

NTA: Lawyer dealing with unreliable troublemakers and reputation concerns.

NTA: The child’s behavior may be due to parental spoiling

11-year-old vs. Lawyer: Who’s the real courtroom mastermind?

NTA. Parenting woes: spoiled child or medical/emotional problems? Lawyer up!

Unexpected situation: Leaving her at my house without a plan!
