Picture this: a cherished doll from the Disney movie *Encanto*, a little girl’s favorite toy, and a family gathering that turns sour. When 4-year-old Amy refuses to share her beloved Mirabel doll with her 6-year-old cousin Julie, tensions rise. Julie, known for her disobedient tendencies, takes matters into her own hands and gives the doll a disastrous ‘makeover’ with nail polish. Now, Amy’s mom is demanding Julie’s parents replace the ruined doll, but they’re not having it. Let’s dive into this family drama and see how it unfolds!
The Doll: A Precious Gift
Julie’s Disobedient Streak
The Doll Debacle Begins
A Temporary Truce
Disaster Strikes!
The Makeover Nightmare
Julie’s Explanation ♀️
Nat’s Solution: Hug It Out?
Amy’s Mom Demands a New Doll
Nat’s Refusal
Taking It to the Husband
A New Doll and Apology
Nat’s Blame Game
MIL’s Take
Doll Drama Divides Family: Who’s Right?
As the doll drama unfolds, Amy’s mom insists that Nat and her husband replace the ruined Mirabel doll. Nat refuses, saying it’s an innocent mistake and both girls should apologize. After taking the matter to Nat’s husband, he agrees to buy a new doll and makes Julie apologize. But now, Nat blames Amy’s mom for their marital spat, and even Amy’s grandmother thinks she should apologize for escalating the situation. Who’s right in this tangled web of family conflict? Let’s see what the internet has to say about it!
RELATED STORIES
NTA for cutting off toxic relatives, they got what they deserved
Infuriating in-law incident: ruined doll, spite, and no boundaries. NTA!
NTA. Julie’s destructive behavior and lack of boundaries is concerning
NTA. Nat’s parenting style criticized, but husband supports her.
“Sharing” vs. Boundaries: Teaching Kids Ownership and Consequences
NTA, parents responsible for child’s damage. In-laws owe new doll.
Sister-in-law’s parenting criticized, husband resolves issue. MIL should back off.
NTA. Teaching kids to share or value their belongings?
Setting a bad example for her daughter. NTA.
Parents refuse to replace ruined doll, NTA takes a stand!
NTA! Stand your ground, they should replace the doll.
Julie’s entitlement: apple doesn’t fall far from the tree
NTA: Doll vs. nail polish, sharing vs. destroying. Raising a brat
NTA. Commendable for standing up for your daughter’s boundaries
Teaching moment for spoiled child, but parents need reality check
Standing up for your child: NTA, consequences for everyone
Late to learn about consequences, but better than never!
Demanding justice for a ruined doll: Who’s the spoiled child?
NTA. In-laws favoritism and lack of respect for boundaries.
Dad takes charge and shuts down spoiled behavior.
NTA stands up to spoiled child, MIL needs to back off.
NTA – Nat’s parenting skills questioned. Drama ensues!
NTA: Mom needs to teach daughter responsibility now, not later.
Cutting ties with toxic in-laws over ruined doll incident
NTA: Who’s the real spoiled one?
Sharing: Do adults do it? Should kids have to?
“NTA. Parent’s responsibility to replace broken doll. Drama over nothing.”
Protective parent defends daughter’s sentimental doll from disrespectful in-laws
NTA. Nat’s lack of common courtesy sparks tension among everyone.
NTA! Standing up for your daughter against unreasonable expectations!
In-laws won’t replace doll. Commenter says they’re not spoiled.
NTA! Your kid had nothing to apologize for.
Who’s the real spoiled one? Find out in this comment section!
NTA. Julie wanted to take, not share. Not cool
NTA: Julie destroyed the doll because Amy said no.
Julie’s mother is the real reason behind her spoiled behavior. ♀️
