Humiliated Disabled Sister-in-law: Justified or Cruel?

We’ve all had our fair share of family drama, but this one takes the cake! A woman (36F) is struggling with her sister-in-law (32F), who she claims often uses her disability and eating disorder to manipulate others. After a devastating miscarriage, our protagonist is forced into a family video call where her sister-in-law, Dani, makes a heart-wrenching comment. In a moment of anger, she retaliates by revealing a shocking secret about Dani’s past. Now, she’s left wondering if she went too far. Let’s dive into the story…

Introducing the Sister-in-law

The Ultimate Excuse

Mysterious Disability

A Painful Loss

Avoiding Dani ‍♀️

The Dreaded Video Call

Dani’s Cold Response ❄️

A Shocking Revelation

The Aftermath

Husband’s Reaction

Feeling Guilty?

Important Note

A Family Feud Gone Too Far?

So, there you have it – a family feud that escalated into a jaw-dropping revelation. Our protagonist is left feeling guilty and questioning her actions after exposing her sister-in-law’s infidelity. With her husband suggesting she was too harsh, and the family now in turmoil, it’s hard not to wonder if she went too far. But what do you think? Let’s take a look at some of the top responses from the internet…

NTA defends herself against husband’s sister’s cruel comment and cheating.

ESH, but justified. OP had enough of SIL’s cruelty.

Commenter defends OP’s story, agrees sister-in-law deserved it.

Husband’s betrayal and demand for apology overshadow SIL’s actions.

NTA comment defends OP’s cruel response to disabled sister-in-law.

Calling out bad behavior: NTA, cheating is never right

User defends OP and points to ‘missing stair’ phenomenon

Defending family from ableist behavior. NTA

Enablers defending cruel sister-in-law. Husband needs therapy.

Commenter calls out disabled sister-in-law for using her disability

Both sides acted poorly, but SIL’s comment was outrageous

Commenter defends knocking down ableist sister-in-law.

Calling out cheaters is justified, disability not relevant.

Judgment of ESH due to affair and enabling of r**e behavior

Commenter defends OP with a bold statement and attitude

Advice for dealing with a difficult sister-in-law and husband

Retaliation isn’t stellar but revealing her history was hurtful

Disability info requested, received unexpected and N**W response

Family drama exposes liar and cheater, NTA but secrets hurt.

NTA defends response to disabled sister-in-law’s regular j**k behavior.

Tension and past trauma may have fueled hurtful comments.

NTA comment shuts down argument with sassy southern saying

Supportive reply defends OP and criticizes husband.

Commenter acknowledges both sides, but behavior still unacceptable. ‍♀️

NTA. Husband should have stood up for you. Disgusting behavior

Don’t use disability as an excuse for bad behavior.

NTA, but Dani needs to stop using her disability as an excuse.

NTA stands up to emotionally abusive SIL, husband needs to reevaluate.

NTA defends OP and criticizes husband’s family for cruel comment.

Defending oneself against ableist insults, ESH, husband included.

NTA. Questioning the relationship and loyalty to spouse.

Commenter doubts SIL’s excuses for behavior, calls ‘b******t’ on ED.

Stand up to abuse, disability doesn’t justify being abusive.

Revealing her transgression after she insulted your loss. NTA

NTA commenter empathizes with OP’s reaction to cruel sister-in-law.

ESH for weaponizing a fact and humiliating sister-in-law

Commenter believes karma caught up with the sister-in-law

Commenter calls out horrible behavior and ableism.

Standing up to ableism: justified or cruel?

Mental illness doesn’t excuse rudeness. Reevaluate your relationship with husband.

Fighting fire with fire? NTA takes a stand.

Commenter suggests leaving husband after sister-in-law incident.

NTA commenter defends disabled sister-in-law, condemns vile thoughts.

Calling out cruelty: NTA for standing up for kindness.

NTA feels guilty for calling out manipulative family and AH husband

Irrelevant insult? NTA thinks so.

Defending disabled sister-in-law after cruel attack: NTA

NTA commenter says disabled sister-in-law deserved it

NTA calls out cheating sister-in-law for using disability as excuse.

Disabled sister-in-law’s behavior is unacceptable. Husband needs intervention.

NTA comment calls out ableism and justifies the husband’s actions.

Curiosity about affair, justified revenge, and anger towards coddling.

Husband problem, not SIL problem. NTA.

Calling out a scummy person and justified actions. Condolences offered.

Publicly exposing a monstrous comment. NTA wins this round.

Husband and SIL are the a**holes, NTA for standing up.

NTA. Commenter defends against sister-in-law’s verbal attack.

Commenter calls out sister-in-law’s fake disability, receives support.

Cheating and cruelty: NTA stands up to disabled sister-in-law

Legal-savvy commenter suggests SIL should have expected retaliation

Sibling loyalty questioned in pregnancy reveal

Not the a**hole, but what’s the story behind it?

Both parties acted poorly, but sharing cheating was unnecessary ‍♀️

Questioning motives and honesty in family drama

NTA comment calls out disabled sister-in-law’s behavior with passion

Winning a*****e prizes

Toxic family dynamic. Leave them both behind.

ESH, but Dani deserved it. Mature response was an option ‍♀️

Last Updated on June 20, 2023 by Diply Social Team