Imagine getting engaged to the love of your life, only to find out that your well-off fiancé spent a mere $150 on your engagement ring. That’s the situation one woman found herself in, and she’s not sure how to feel about it. Her fiancé, who can afford luxury watches and surprise getaways, opted for a ring that looks more like a stacker than an engagement ring. Is she wrong for being upset about this? Let’s dive into her story. ♀️
Fiancé’s Financial Situation

The Underwhelming Ring

Awkward Family Reactions

Symbol of Love?

Worth More Than a Console?

Edit: Ring Details

Cheap in Look and Cost

Unhappy with the Ring, Not the Engagement ❤️

The Confrontation

The Shocking Truth

The End of the Relationship

No More Hideous Ring

Unwanted DMs

The Unraveling of a Relationship
Our protagonist thought she was just upset about her fiancé’s choice of a $150 engagement ring, but the situation took an unexpected turn. After confronting him, she discovered he had been having an affair and intentionally bought a cheap ring to make her look like a gold digger. She’s now staying with her mother, trying to make sense of it all. But hey, at least she doesn’t have to wear that hideous ring anymore! Let’s see what the internet thinks of this wild turn of events…
NTA for wanting a nicer ring, but communication is key

Expecting style and quality in an engagement ring, but facing backlash

Whiplash from update, OP not the a**hole. Shocking twist!

Commenter shocked by sudden escalation in relationship and advises moving on.

“NTA, communicate and find out the reasoning behind the ring. “

NTA: Shocking plot twist in a rollercoaster of emotions

NAH. Engaging discussion on the value of an engagement ring

Demanding pics of trash ring? YES SEND THE PICS

NTA – Fiancé’s $150 ring: a brain fart or selfish? YTA comments predictable. Reddit and bitching about money, iconic duo. Some responses dumb. Calling valued things “shallow” and “materialistic” is blind.

NTA: The ring should be worth showing off and feeling special.

Why would he admit everything instead of keeping it a secret?

NTA. Consider it a blessing, now you can choose your own
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/1a0113dc-41f8-45c0-b19d-0710f9ba2a4e.png)
Engaging in open communication for a ring she loves

“Quality rings are important! You deserve better than a $150 ring.”

Commenter suggests exposing manipulative ex-fiancé to friends and family.

Proposing to break up? All Time A-hole Award winner!

NTA: Quality engagement rings should reflect the thought put into it

A quick turn from love to disappointment. NTA.

Engagement rings: Love or a stingy move? NTA thinks cheap.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/f0197720-348a-47c4-b408-527530b7d0bf.png)
NTA: A $150 engagement ring, love or stinginess? Share thoughts!

NTA. Engagement ring symbolizes future. If not joint decision, be upset

NTA: $150 ring – cheap or thoughtful? Discuss!

NTA: The history of engagement rings and the importance of symbols.

Being upset about the ring doesn’t make you a gold-digger

NTA: $150 engagement ring too cheap, should spend more for love

Fiancé values material possessions over engagement ring, communication issues?
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/f911c59a-216b-49bc-8600-6e45bccb8e52.png)
NTA: Spending so little on an engagement ring is a red flag

Unexpected twist: Fiancé’s cheap ring leads to revenge plan!

NTA: Disappointed by cheap engagement ring, gaming console costs more.
