Family gatherings can often lead to unexpected drama, especially when it comes to discussing sensitive topics such as inheritance. This is a story of two brothers, a grandfather’s will, a biological grandson, and a step-grandson. The question at the heart of the matter? Should the step-grandson be entitled to the same inheritance as the biological grandson? Let’s dive into this intriguing family saga…
The Inheritance Conundrum Begins

The Will’s Contents Revealed

The Step-Grandson Enters the Picture

The Dispute Ignites

The Family Meal Turns Tense ️

The Morality vs Practicality Debate

Accusations Fly Across the Dinner Table ️

A Question of Family Worth

The Aftermath: Silence and Accusations

Inheritance Drama: A Tale of Two Brothers, a Will, and a Step-Grandson
In a classic case of family dynamics clashing with financial matters, two brothers find themselves at odds over their late grandfather’s will. The bone of contention? Whether the step-grandson should be entitled to the same inheritance as the biological grandson. The argument, which unfolded during a family meal, touched on sensitive topics of family worth, biological ties, and the sanctity of a deceased loved one’s wishes. As accusations flew, the question remains, who was in the right? Let’s see what the online world thinks of this situation…
NTA. Grandpa’s decision is final. No reason to argue.

“NTA. Your brother Ben should know the reason his girlfriend’s stepson was excluded from the will. It’s the same reason that he hasn’t married this lady despite having been with her for three years. How can he expect his grandfather to bequeath his assets on her child when he barely even knows them?”

Deceased’s wishes respected, stepson not entitled to grandpa’s estate. NTA

NTA: Brother’s stepson isn’t family, absurd to expect trust fund.

NTA: Grandpa’s will, brother’s rudeness, and family drama.

NTA, brother’s jealousy/greed hides insecurity about stepson in traditional family

NTA! Stand your ground and shut down the drama

Grandpa’s money, grandpa’s rules. NTA, no entitlement here.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/65825205-edf2-4347-8e40-87abcf66bb97.png)
Supportive brother defends stepson in family feud over will. NTA

Ben should consider setting up a trust for Josh’s future
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/7a832ecc-35b5-4c68-bc10-0cbcf9f587ce.png)
NTA: Ben wants someone else to fund a trust for Josh

Grandpa’s money, grandpa’s rules. You’re not the a**hole!

NTA, let your brothers decide their own trust funds.

NTA – Grandpa’s will, new children, and family dynamics explained.

NTA. Josh is not family, no entitlement to inheritance.

NTA: Josh’s parents and grandparents can provide for him financially.

NTA – Arguing is pointless. Can’t change the will.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/6e69076f-8764-4cef-926f-58403daed149.png)
NTA! Grandpa’s money, his choice. No obligation to be fair.

NTA. Brother’s entitlement to grandpa’s money is unjustified.

Engaging with the complexities of legal and financial recognition in relationships.

Grandpa’s money, his decision. NTA. It’s pretty common, TBH.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/9952ff85-bf11-493f-b79e-24cb3d87837d.png)
NTA. Ben’s fiance’s son not considered family yet. Fair question about inheritance.

No entitlement to estate, could have donated or given to children

Grandpa’s will: NTA, respect his choice.

“NTA You are right what’s done is done.”

NTA. Ben’s stepson isn’t a stepson yet. Grandfather’s choice matters.

NTA: Dead grandpa’s will causing family feud.

Unmarried couple’s inheritance dispute sparks heated debate.

Executor should follow the will. Brother’s opinion is irrelevant.

“NTA. It’s your Grandfather’s estate, he can distribute it as he wishes.”

NTA. Inheritance isn’t based on acquaintanceship, it’s about family ties!

Ben’s resentment and mixed feelings about his relationship and family.

Not the a**hole. What’s the story behind this family feud?

Family feud over inheritance: NTA, but it’s your grandfather’s will

Respect your grandfather’s wishes and let it go.

“Step-dad’s insensitive comment sparks family feud over grandpa’s will.”

NTA: The rightful heir or a family feud?

NTA. Brother’s inheritance drama at family dinner, lacking class

Not the a**hole. Let’s hear the juicy details!
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/a91c2f7f-e9ba-4a3b-97c3-7760047a8c16.png)
“NTA. Brother’s choice to raise another man’s child, but no entitlement.”

NTA- Wills vs. Christmas: High stakes, family dynamics, and divorces

Grandpa’s will causes family feud over custody rights. NTA.

Ben should take responsibility for Josh, not expect others to.

Legally, the kid has no relationship to the dead grandpa.

NTA. Grandfather couldn’t predict brother’s relationship. No inheritance for girlfriend’s son.

Grandpa’s will sparks family feud. Commenter defends NTA stance.

“Ben’s girlfriend might be playing him for her son.”

Sibling rivalry over inheritance, no provisions for potential grandchildren. ♂️

Grandpa’s will sparks hurt feelings and a family feud.

NTA. Ben can set aside inheritance for gf’s son. No obligation.

Ben can set up a trust for his stepson. NTA

Respecting grandpa’s choice: NTA can split inheritance for Josh

NTA: Grandfather’s will, stepson vs. girlfriend’s child. Money matters.

NTA. Brother wants trust fund for girlfriend’s son, not fair.

NTA: Grandfather’s right to bequeath as he saw fit

NTA. Family dynamics change, blood ties remain strong.

Respect grandpa’s will. Stepson not entitled. Brother can make trust.

Engaging comment about the complexities of inheritance and adoption.

NTA. Grandfather’s intentional wishes, no entitlement for Cassie and Ben.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/76de7fe2-57bb-48e5-a6f2-add363faa332.png)
NTA. You’re right! Your grandfather’s will, your rules.

When does ‘my gf’s son’ become family? Not the day grandpa wrote the will.

Take your share and create a trust yourself!
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/7b6e5397-467b-4b17-a6a5-b967a02bd3e6.png)
Grandpa’s will: NTA comment defends Josh’s exclusion with logical reasoning.

Stepson has no claim to inheritance. Brother’s argument is invalid.

NTA: Grandfather left to HIS family. Drama with GF suspected.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/4c089e97-04b9-4e39-9602-97a572053879.png)
NTA. Josh’s relationship with his grandparents and step-grandparents.

NTA. Ben’s legal rights to Josh are uncertain, but it’s complicated.

Grandpa’s choice may be influenced by relationship status and knowledge.

“NTA. Ben is beyond wrong. No family relationship with Josh. “

NTA. Grandpa’s will, family dynamics, and future engagement uncertainties.

Not the a**hole. Let’s hear the juicy details!

Josh not entitled to inheritance because he’s not legally related.

NTA. No legal obligation without marriage or adoption.

Brother’s wild claim: girlfriend’s child shouldn’t get inheritance. Valid?

Grandpa’s money, Grandpa’s call. Share the wealth, NTA!
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/88095707-886a-4763-9829-6d53fde38c96.png)
NTA, entitlement is real. Brother got his share, move on.

NTA – Polite disagreement doesn’t make you rude or out of line

NTA – You make a valid point about marriage and adoption
