We’ve all seen those prank videos on YouTube, but what happens when the prankster’s actions have serious consequences? Meet our 23-year-old aspiring Prank YouTuber, who’s about to become a dad, and his 20-year-old techie brother. The techie brother saves up all year to buy the latest iPhone, but his sibling’s prank goes horribly wrong, leaving him with a broken phone and a hefty bill. Should the prankster brother pay for the damages, or is the techie brother being too harsh? Let’s dive into this family drama!
Prankster Brother’s Plan
The Pricey Prank
Brother’s Excuse
Apple’s Verdict
Demanding Compensation
Brother’s Response
Paying Up, But Not Happy
The Guilt Sets In
UPDATE: Brother Finds the Post ️♂️
Reality Check ✋
Brother’s Breakdown
Considering a Refund?
Ex-Girlfriend’s Role
A Possible Solution? ♂️
To Pay or Not to Pay: A Family Dilemma ♂️
In this tale of sibling rivalry and shattered iPhones, our techie brother is left questioning whether he should have demanded compensation from his prankster brother, who’s about to become a dad. After all, the money could have gone towards supporting the baby. But was it fair for the prankster brother to destroy something so valuable in the first place? As the story unfolds, we learn that the techie brother is considering refunding the money, but with a twist: he might give it directly to the ex-girlfriend to ensure it’s spent on the baby. Let’s see what the internet thinks of this situation…
RELATED STORIES
NTA, brother’s ‘prank’ was straight up stupidity and destruction of property
Aspiring prank youtuber faces consequences for criminal ‘prank’. NTA.
Brother’s ‘prank’ backfires, commenters call him out for being AH
Brother’s prank backfires, demands phone replacement. NTA stands firm.
Brother’s destructive prank earns him a justified NTA verdict
NTA demands justice for phone vandalism, gift prank definition.
Brother’s ‘prank’ backfires, commenters call for financial responsibility
NTA for demanding phone replacement. Commenter suggests dad-to-be may be immature
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/eb15187b-b0d7-42a8-b11f-0897dcceef44.png)
Brother’s age questioned after phone prank gone wrong
Future of child raised by prank YouTuber and enabler discussed
Commenter calls out brother’s immaturity and lack of responsibility ♂️
Brother’s prank backfires, new dad demands replacement phone
Commenter warns of legal consequences for phone-breaking dad-to-be.
Calling out ‘prank’ excuses for bad behavior
Deliberate destruction of property isn’t a prank. NTA
Brother’s prank backfires, commenters agree he’s immature for fatherhood
Brother’s ‘prank’ was assault, demanding phone replacement is reasonable
Commenter calls out irresponsible brother’s breeding habits
NTA for demanding phone replacement, but is buying a new phone every year financially wasteful?
NTA, fair to demand phone replacement for prank gone wrong
New dad-to-be demands phone replacement after brother’s prank gone wrong. Commenters agree: NTA
Commenter calls out prank culture on YouTube for views
Commenter expresses concern for unborn child’s future, supports OP.
Brother’s prank backfires, Redditor suggests revenge with viral potential
Brother’s prank backfires, dad-to-be demands phone replacement. NTA wins.
Prank or Property Damage? NTA calls out phone destruction
Brother vandalizes phone, demands money for prank gone wrong. NTA.
Brother’s ‘prank’ backfires, new dad demands phone replacement
Taking responsibility for damage is key. Don’t prank irresponsibly.
Commenter calls out brother’s immaturity in phone prank
NTA OP’s brother’s ‘prank’ was childish and not funny
Investigative dad-to-be stands up to manipulative brother
Brother’s ‘prank’ deemed stupid by commenter, warns against future dangers
Brother’s destructive prank backfires, dad-to-be demands phone replacement. NTA.
NTA demands payment for broken phone
Harmless pranks are fine, but property damage is not.
Exploiting people for YouTube views is cruel and shameful
New dad-to-be demands phone replacement, comment suggests pressing charges
NTA for making him pay for the phone. Money-saving advice
Commenter calls out new dad-to-be for destructive behavior
Commenter calls out destructive prankster’s hypocritical money-making scheme.
Brother’s prank backfires, new dad-to-be demands phone replacement
NTA! Destroying property is not a prank.
Brother’s prank backfires, new dad demands phone replacement. NTA agrees.
Commenter defends title, clarifies NTA judgment.
Brother’s destructive prank leads to justified phone replacement demand.
Commenters agree: phone destruction isn’t a prank
Brother’s prank goes too far, NTA calls him out
Commenter calls out brother’s stupidity and lack of responsibility.
Commenter slams brother for breaking phone, taking money from nephew.
Brother’s irresponsible prank causes inconvenience and demands compensation
Commenter calls out hypocrisy in phone replacement dispute
Demanding reimbursement for phone damage caused by brother’s prank
Commenter defends new dad-to-be’s right to demand phone replacement
Commenter calls out brother’s prank as unfunny and inappropriate
