Picture this: You’ve just bought your first house and decide to host a grand BBQ party, inviting family and friends over to celebrate. Among the guests is your wife’s brother, Jim, who’s been sober for five months and has a habit of ‘saving’ everyone from the perils of alcohol. You’ve made it clear: no preaching at the party. But what happens when Jim can’t resist making a snide comment? Let’s dive into this sizzling story of a family BBQ that turned into a battleground.
The New Homeowners and the Sober Brother-In-Law

Jim’s Troubled Past and Current Sobriety

The Preaching Problem and the BBQ Invitation

Setting the Ground Rules for the Party

The BBQ Party and the Unwanted Sermon

The Explosive Showdown with Jim

The Aftermath: Was the Host Justified or Overreacting?

BBQ Drama: The Host, the Sober Brother-In-Law, and a Party Turned Sour
In a fiery clash of wills, our BBQ host found himself at odds with his sober brother-in-law, Jim, who couldn’t resist preaching about the dangers of alcohol at the party. Despite being warned to keep his sobriety sermons to himself, Jim’s snide comment to a guest led to an explosive showdown. The host’s decision to kick Jim out has sparked a heated debate: was he justified in his actions or did he overreact? As the smoke settles, let’s see what the internet has to say about this sizzling situation…
NTA. Setting boundaries with a sober brother-in-law at a BBQ

NTA, invited him but didn’t like him. Guests complain.

“NTA. BIL’s ‘recovery journey’ is an ego trip. Insufferable and judgmental.”

“NTA for defending uncle’s coping mechanism. Jim crossed a boundary.”

NTA. Setting boundaries firmly without being aggressive is important.

NTA – Wife’s support for brother raises concerns.

NTA – Kicking out a judgmental guest, BBQ saved from preachiness!

NTA! Shutting down a judgmental person in the only way they understand

NTA: Brother-in-law broke agreement, got booted from BBQ

Reformed addict kicked out of BBQ, justified or overreaction?

AA and sponsor needed to knock his ego out

Curiosity about consequences of discussing taboo topics sparks engaging debate.

Addiction trade-off: NTA’s sober brother-in-law vs. comment reply

NTA and ‘I’ve asked for not a word’ – a phrase book essential!

Preachy AA folks: justified to boot out sober brother-in-law? NTA

NTA defends OP against unfair judgment. Phone call is crucial!

NTA: Empathizing with the frustration of a disregarded warning

Sobriety isn’t the issue, it’s his preachy a**hole-ness.

NTA. Sobriety can be exhausting, but stay strong and kind!

NTA: Jim’s sermon at BBQ was a major party foul!

Ex-husband’s insufferable preaching and hypocrisy. NTA.

NTA. Firm boundary set and maintained. Good for you!

NTA: Sober brother-in-law is just ‘dry’ and not truly sober.

Clear boundaries set before, tough luck for the sober brother-in-law.

NTA: Set boundaries, consequences, and focus on your own life.

NTA. Boundaries set, but still crossed. Drama at the BBQ!

NTA: Sober brother-in-law gets booted from BBQ, sparks debate.

Support for kicking out preachy people at BBQs!

NTA: Rules were clear, he had fair warning.

NTA: Brother-in-law violated trust by forcing sobriety on others.

NTA: Rules broken, too bad so sad

Sober brother-in-law’s advice: justified or overreaction?

NTA: Brother-in-law’s lies and judgmental behavior crossed the line.

NTA. Sober brother-in-law overstepped boundaries, tension escalated. Bad blood.

NTA: BBQ host confused by brother-in-law’s motives.

Engaging insight on addiction and religious zeal from a chaplain

Not the a**hole for booting out sober brother-in-law.

NTA, but insisting on exact words sidetracked the conversation.

NTA. Jim needs to understand that drinking is his problem and no one else’s

NTA. Insufferable brother-in-law gets booted from BBQ. UGH

NTA! Sober brother-in-law crossed a boundary, attention-seeking addict. Justified decision.

Sober guest avoids party crowd, keeps it entertaining

Setting boundaries at a BBQ

Recovering alcoholic friend constantly accuses me of being a heavy drinker

Stick to the agreement, NTA, but avoid arguments and name-calling.

NTA. Stick to your own inventory and let him be.

NTA: In-laws got mad when I quit drinking, so I blocked them

NTA – Poor taste joke after explicit warning. No benefit of doubt.

BIL’s sobriety obsession: NTA for kicking him out.

21 years sober in AA: Self-diagnosed disease, NTA

YBA: Preachy vs. Jump the Gun – Who’s the real a**hole?
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/4c13727e-c1f9-436a-94af-e9ab3a8ded3f.png)
NTA: Jim’s a thief, deadbeat, and public hazard. No more chances.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/6449afce-896d-4233-bf01-36924d0fb596.png)
A simple warning would have been enough!

NTA: Sobriety and family dynamics collide in BBQ showdown.

NTA. Sober brother-in-law should mind his own business.

Annoying sober brother-in-law gets booted from BBQ party.

OP effectively sets boundaries with brother-in-law, ensuring no repeat.

NTA: Alcoholics quit when they decide to. Can it, BIL!

NTA: Jim projecting his thoughts on others, wife should not defend.

Respecting the host’s decision: NTA, but would you do the same?

Understanding the struggles of sobriety and offering leniency
