Woman Won’t Take in Sister’s Husband After She Passes Away, but Takes in Nieces Instead. AITA?

Losing a loved one is never easy, and it’s especially difficult for children who lose a parent. But what happens when the remaining parent is not on good terms with the family? One woman faced this dilemma when her brother-in-law asked her to take him and her nieces in after her sister’s death.

However, due to past conflicts, she only agreed to take in the children. This decision caused a rift in the family, with some questioning if she made the right choice. Read on to find out if she’s the a**hole in this situation .

Taking in nieces, but not brother-in-law after sister’s passing

Refusing to take in sister’s husband due to legal issues

Woman refuses to take in sister’s husband after her death.

Woman refuses to take in sister’s husband, takes in nieces instead

Refusing sister’s husband after her death to care for nieces. AITA?

Niece wants her dad, husband disagrees. Tensions rise

Woman refuses to take in sister’s husband after her passing

A woman lost her sister to cancer and now finds herself in a difficult situation. Her sister’s husband is struggling to pay off debts and has asked to move in with her and her family, but they have a troubled past. The woman has agreed to take in her nieces, but not their father. This decision has caused tension within the family, with some members accusing her of being selfish and making it more difficult for the grieving girls. However, the woman stands by her decision and believes that she is doing what’s best for her family. The situation is complicated further by the fact that her husband is now having second thoughts and the 16-year-old niece keeps arguing about wanting her dad with them. It remains to be seen how this situation will resolve itself, but it’s clear that emotions are running high. In the next section, we’ll take a look at some of the reactions and comments to this difficult situation.

Woman refuses sister’s hostile husband to live with her but takes in nieces instead. NTA!

Unanswered questions and blocking nieces, YTA

BIL sued OP and showed up unprepared, but OP is willing to help nieces.

Commenter requests more info before giving judgement.

Commenter suggests practical info needed, others suspect OP’s hiding something

Commenter asks for more info on house lawsuit, suggests focusing on nieces’ wellbeing.

Commenter questions OP’s entitlement to sister’s house, hints at foul play.

Curious commenter asks about aunt’s absence in child care responsibilities

Commenter questions OP’s story, thinks they’re TA

Sister’s husband suing you for the house? NTA for not taking him in

Commenter questions OP’s motives, suggests hidden agenda.

OP hesitant to take in sister’s husband; soft YTA. Suggests formal lease.

Commenter asks for more context, deems OP YTA.

NTA for not taking in sister’s husband after he sued you.

Seeking info to judge fairly

Taking in nieces but not sister’s husband after her death? YTA ‍♀️

OP sparks curiosity about a suing situation.

Commenter suggests daughters and father should be together.

Curious about the backstory? Get the details here.

Caring for the nieces but not the BIL? YTA according to commenters

Missing details create confusion and emotional tension in the situation.

Can she dish it out, but can’t take it?

Aunt to the rescue ‍♀️ Taking in the nieces instead ‍ ‍

Aunt passes away, but who should take care of the girls?

Unpacking the situation – INFO needed!

NTA, but beware of potential tenant issues

What details are missing? ESH situation explained.

Curious about details surrounding home lawsuit and BIL conflict.

Did OP buy the house alone? NTA or YTA depending.

Commenter questions motives of sister’s husband after past legal actions

Aunt won’t take in nieces but criticizes sister’s choice.

Respect OP’s decision, NTA.

Choosing not to take in sister’s husband after her passing. Protecting oneself & nieces from potential trouble. NTA

Sister’s husband tried to steal house, OP NTA.

Curious about alternative living arrangements for sister’s family.

Commenter calls out both parties for poor behavior. ESH

Aunt won’t take in sister’s husband, takes nieces instead. Fair?

Compassionate move: Woman takes in nieces instead of sister’s husband ❤️

NTA for not taking in sister’s husband after he tried to steal your house and sue you. Take care of his children instead

Commenter defends woman’s decision not to take in sister’s husband.

Taking in nieces but not BIL after sister’s death. NTA.

Aunt avoided taking in brother-in-law but took in nieces instead

NTA for prioritizing safety and legal precautions over family ties

NTA. Choosing not to take in sister’s husband after mistreatment.

Woman refuses to take in sister’s husband after her death. NTA.

Choosing not to take in sister’s husband, NTA. Safety first

Curious about the lawsuit and family dynamic

Commenter calls out poster for potentially being an a**hole

Seeking more information to judge NTA stance.

Commenter hesitates to call OP TA due to past legal issues

Choosing to not take in sister’s husband after his past actions

NTA takes in nieces, but not sister’s husband. Commenter suggests explaining to nieces why he can’t stay. Reply sarcastically agrees.

Curious about why sister didn’t receive share of mom’s house

BIL wants in on your home after suing you? ESH. Nieces need support too.

Commenter accuses OP of being TA for not taking in nieces’ father after sister’s death.

Choose family or not? Engaging debate on niece’s dad.

Don’t let your dispute break up a family. YTA

A question of family responsibilities.

Complicated situation, but prioritizing the kids was a good move

Sarcastic comment sparks no replies, guess aunt’s not convinced ‍♀️

Choosing revenge over support for grieving nieces makes YTA

Curious about lawsuit, no verdict yet.

Curiosity arises: Who inherited the house?

Taking in nieces, not sister’s husband. NTA for prioritizing safety.

Protecting her home from sister’s husband.

Protect your assets! ️ Siding with OP in family feud.