Weddings are supposed to be a time of joy and celebration, but for one family, the topic has turned into a battleground. A mother shared her story about her daughter’s second wedding, and the conflict that ensued when she and her husband refused to pay for it. The daughter accused her parents of being homophobic, but is there more to the story? Let’s dive in!
A Choice for the Children
A Small Wedding or a Big One?
Sara’s First Marriage
A New Chapter for Sara
Accepting Laura into the Family ❤️
Engagement and Family Dynamics ❤️
Samuel’s Big Wedding
Sara’s Second Wedding Plans
The One-Time Offer
Accusations of Homophobia
A Fair Deal for Both Kids ♀️
Cold Shoulder from Sara and Laura ❄️
Seeking Answers ️♀️
A Wedding Dilemma: Fairness or Homophobia?
In a twist of events, Sara’s second wedding has caused a rift in the family. After her parents refuse to pay for her wedding to her fiancée Laura, Sara accuses them of homophobia. However, her parents claim that their original deal was a one-time offer for both their children, and they have been fair to both. With tensions running high, let’s see what the internet thinks of this situation…
RELATED STORIES
Parents not obligated to pay for daughter’s second wedding
NTA. Expecting parents to pay for second wedding is ridiculous
Daughter wants 2nd wedding, parents refuse. NTA.
Wedding offer is not an all-you-can-eat buffet. NTA
Daughter accused parents of homophobia after refusing to pay for wedding
Daughter’s entitlement for a second wedding is ridiculous
NTA but make reparations for past homophobic behavior. No obligation for second wedding expenses, but show support.
User expresses frustration with entitled posts on subreddit.
Supportive comment suggests calm talk with daughter after second wedding.
Daughter wants parents to pay for second wedding, commenter says NTA.
Daughter wants parents to pay for second wedding, commenters disagree
Daughter views parents as a money pit, commenter supports NTA.
Daughter acting entitled, using homophobia to bully parents. Don’t cave in.
Daughter’s entitlement not related to her being bisexual. NTA.
Setting boundaries for second weddings, with a side of homophobia
NTA. Daughter had a lovely wedding, doesn’t need another.
One wedding and/or down payment covered, greedy to expect more
Fairness in wedding expenses, suggest open communication with daughter
Supportive comment, suggests meeting for coffee to explain reasoning ☕
Parental misunderstanding leads to hurt feelings and potential reconciliation ❤️
Daughter’s entitlement and sexuality used to guilt-trip parents. NTA.
Supportive comment defends daughter’s bisexuality, calls out parent’s behavior.
Suggest offering support in other ways to show love ❤️
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/fc084869-5a1e-467f-bfaa-f578157da659.png)
Parents not obligated to pay for second wedding. NTA.
Engaging in a discussion about throwing the “homophobic” card
Daughter upset over no payment for second wedding, parent NTA
NTA. Sara’s self-centeredness and sexuality brought up in discussion.
Offer symbolic amount, be involved in other aspects of wedding
Equal treatment for both children, not being homophobic. NTA
Daughter’s second wedding not about sexuality, but greediness. NTA
Spoiling kids leads to entitled expectations. NTA
Wedding funding is a one-time deal, NTA
Supportive comment applauds parent’s growth and refusal to pay for wedding.
Daughter’s second wedding, parents refuse to pay. NTA.
Parent’s past mistakes lead to daughter’s unrealistic expectations. NTA.
Keeping your word doesn’t make you the a**hole
Savage response to daughter’s wedding request.
User calls out entitled behavior and homophobia ️
Parent offers advice on how to frame refusal of funds
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/ea897fc2-de12-4bcf-8668-3442c45606e8.png)
Supportive parents navigate daughter’s second wedding with empathy and love ❤️
Daughter’s second wedding: NTA parents won’t pay for it
Daughter’s entitlement questioned after parents refuse to pay for wedding.
NTA for refusing to pay for second wedding. Entitlement at finest
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/fd936a0c-0a64-48f8-a087-b1d3237915ef.png)
Parent refuses to pay for daughter’s second wedding. NTA.
Wedding déjà vu: Parents not obligated to pay for round two
Parents refuse to pay for daughter’s second wedding. NTA.
NTA. Not homophobic. Just not paying for two weddings.
Engaging suggestion to talk and share finances with daughter.
Wedding funds don’t grow on trees
Parents were fair to refuse funding for daughter’s second wedding
Daughter expects too much, NTA for refusing to pay again
Daughter already had her wedding, no obligation to pay again
Wedding gift is a one-time offer, not recurring sum
Daughter demands 2nd wedding payment, parents refuse. NTA.
Homophobia disguised as concern for LGBTQ+ community ♂️
Parents not obligated to pay for second wedding, offer support instead
Parents not obligated to pay for second wedding, NTA
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/6e9919a5-5ebd-48aa-aa11-45029dd30291.png)
Homophobic comment defending not paying for daughter’s wedding ♂️
Wedding couple should save up and not demand parents’ help ❤️
Daughter is entitled and playing the homophobia card. NTA.
Daughter’s second wedding not expected, but homophobia is evident
Clear boundaries set, NTA for not funding second wedding.
Parents refuse to pay for second wedding, NTA comment section.
Parents not obligated to pay for second wedding. NTA.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/a26b82ce-b4a0-48c8-ab55-3dc0c896103c.png)
Daughter feels entitled, but OP is NTA for not paying.
Daughter’s entitlement: NTA parent won’t pay for second wedding
