Imagine you’re at a friendly gathering, and a joke about past relationships takes a sour turn. Suddenly, one friend, let’s call him John, decides to label a woman ‘promiscuous’ for her past. Another friend, our storyteller, decides to level the playing field by reminding John of his own past exploits. But here’s the twist: John’s new girlfriend, Wendy, is hearing this for the first time. Let’s dive into this drama-filled tale.
The Usual Suspects ️♂️

Meet Wendy, the Newcomer

Amy’s Joke Takes a Sour Turn

John’s Uncool Response

John’s Past Revealed

The Fallout Begins ☠️

The ‘Bro Code’ Debunked

The End of a Friendship

Group Consensus: John’s a Douche ️

The Group ‘Breakup’ with John

‘Bro Code’ Excuse Banned

John’s Reaction to the Group’s Decision

Amy’s Final Word

Amy’s Joke to End It All

The Fall of a ‘Bro’: A Tale of Double Standards and Broken Friendships
In a tale that’s as old as time, a group of friends find themselves in a heated debate over past relationships and double standards. John, who called a woman out for her past, gets a taste of his own medicine when his own promiscuous history is revealed in front of his new girlfriend, Wendy. As the dust settles, the group decides to part ways with John, citing his hypocrisy and ‘bro code’ excuse as the final straws. What’s the internet’s take on this drama-filled saga? Let’s find out…
NTA exposes friend’s hypocrisy, sparks discussion on slut shaming.

NTA. Defending a friend against a misogynistic attack and double standards

NTA. Exposing hypocrisy and misogyny. Wendy deserves better.

NTA. Sticking up for Amy against slut-shaming and hypocrisy

John’s unnecessary comment about Amy backfired, sparking a backlash.

NTA. Exposing promiscuous past: misogyny or loyalty to friends?

NTA. Standing up for Amy against hypocritical friend.

NTA exposes friend’s past, faces consequences. Shocked pikachu face

NTA: Don’t dish it out if you can’t take it

NTA. Calling out a hypocritical d-bag: hero or villain?

NTA: Exposing hypocrisy and standing up for your friend!

NTA: Exposing secrets, but redeemed by protecting Amy.

NTA: Throwing stones in glasshouses? Let’s discuss!

NTA. Shut shaming is a no go for either gender.

Exposing a lying prick: NTA, you did the right thing!

“Bro code” doesn’t excuse double standards and misogyny. NTA!

NTA. Wendy might be saved!

Exposing promiscuity: Double standards and sister code. NTA!

Calling someone a whore backfires. Hypocrisy exposed. NTA.

NTA. Exposing promiscuous past: breaking double standard

NTA! John’s approach to impress Wendy backfired, revealing his hypocrisy.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/904c9946-b3e1-44b2-b8f0-ecbd8e43ee13.png)
Jealousy or genuine concern? NTA exposes double standards.

NTA. Honoring the bro-code and standing up for Amy

Defending a friend against rude accusations: NTA, you’re a hero!

NTA: Exposing a friend’s past? What an a**hole move!

NTA defends Amy, calls out double standards. Bro codes obsolete.

“NTA: Bro code broken. No loss, SMDH. Banned for speaking.”
