Amber Heard's Lawyer Declares That She Intends To Appeal After Johnny Depp's Win

As People reported, this is largely due to evidentiary issues as she said, "There was so much evidence that did not come in."

She expanded upon this in a clip that has been uploaded to Twitter, saying that Heard's team was not permitted to tell the jury about the court's decision in Depp's previous lawsuit against The Sun in the United Kingdom.

As Bredehoft saw it, the British court had found that Depp had committed at least 12 counts of domestic violence, which included sexual violence.

Bredehoft believes that these strategies cast enough doubt on Heard's character to compel the jury to find for Depp.

She also mentioned that she had tried to use the U.K. judgment to dismiss the case in Virginia because Depp "already had his shot."

As Bredehoft told Guthrie, this is both due to the aforementioned evidentiary issues she identified and because Heard "absolutely" does not have the means to pay Depp's $10.35 million award.

However, this makes it unclear as to how Heard will be able to attempt an appeal as Kentucky attorney Sandra Spurgeon told CBS News that she would likely have to post a bond for the total award, plus interest to do so.

She also said that she went on record as being against setting up cameras in the courtroom because she anticipated that filming the trial would have the effect of turning a sensitive matter into a "zoo."

And although members of the jury aren't supposed to seek any outside influences while deciding a case, Bredehoft believes there's no way they could have avoided it due to a 10-day break in the trial and the likelihood that their families were active on social media.

In her words, "And it was horrible, it really really was lopsided. It was like the Roman Coliseum, how they viewed this case."

h/t: Twitter | @TODAYshow