Office life is often filled with its fair share of drama, from stolen lunches to loud phone conversations. But what happens when a simple act of listening to music becomes a point of contention? A tale of two coworkers is about to unfold, where the clash isn’t about who stole whose stapler, but rather, revolves around the complex issue of sensory sensitivities.
Just an Ordinary Day at the Office

Enter the New Colleague ♂️

The Clash Begins ⚔️

A Compromise Attempted

The Tension Escalates ️

The Standoff

The Aftermath ️

Office Harmony Turned Sour: The Battle Over the Beats
What started as a simple act of listening to music at work turned into a full-blown office drama. Our protagonist, a music-loving employee, found herself at odds with her new colleague, a young man on the autism spectrum, over her tunes. Despite attempts at compromise, the situation escalated, resulting in a standoff and an HR complaint. Now, as they await the verdict, both parties are left questioning their actions. Let’s see what the world has to say about this intriguing clash of workplace etiquette and sensory sensitivity.
Autistic person defends bringing smoothie to work, calls out coworker

NTA: Stand up for yourself and go to HR first!

Autistic person complains about textures, but not interacting with them

NTA. Don’t let his texture issues dictate your routine.

“NTA. Sensory sensitivities can be challenging. Your coworker is entitled. “

NTA, coworker’s unreasonable request. Go to HR to resolve peacefully.

NTA: Workplace accommodations should be reasonable and fair.

NTA: Autistic person’s sensory issues don’t justify dictating your food

NTA: Shake-triggered coworker needs to develop coping skills

NTA questions validity of texture triggers, sparks sensory debate.

Accommodating disabilities: reasonable or excessive? NTA, but boundaries needed.

NTA. Sensory sensitivities clash with traditional office environment

NTA. Sensory sensitivity clash over shaker cups, dietary needs
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/10d71538-cf77-4dab-bb40-775d6dcfc1cd.png)
NTA: You’ve tried to accommodate, his request is unreasonable

NTA: Sensory sensitivities can be accommodated, but there are limits

Controversy erupts over using autism as a controlling tactic

NTA, but is it really about autism or just entitlement?

NTA. Accommodating request, but he’s unsatisfied. Let HR adjudicate

NTA. Shake triggers sensory sensitivity. HR may not understand.

NTA – Stand up for yourself! Let HR handle the drama

Unreasonable request sparks debate. Who’s the real a**hole?

Accommodation efforts failed, HR involvement unlikely to favor him

A considerate gesture sparks a clash over sensory sensitivities

NTA – Accommodating without sacrificing your own comfort. Well done!

Mother defends autistic twins against unreasonable coworker. Fight for accommodation!

NTA. Sensory sensitivities don’t excuse being a jackass

NTA: Stand up for yourself and report the ridiculous demand!

NTA: HR needs improvement

NTA: Don’t let his triggers control your actions!

Stand up for your rights! Seek HR support against harassment. NTA

Email HR now! Document everything. NTA but watch your A.

Autism isn’t an excuse to control others. NTA.

NTA: Boundaries needed when personal sensitivities impact others’ actions.

NTA – He uses his autism to control others

Accommodating others is important, but this is asking too much

NTA, but coworker needs to learn about accommodations.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/d7e1d6aa-1861-4892-a040-5f9942614d38.png)
Take control of the situation and address it with HR

NTA, reasonable accommodations made. Anything further is unreasonable.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/301ca06f-c454-4e6a-b2f9-9f893bce63db.png)
Accusation of faking autism sparks controversy in comment section
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/99aaf2ad-2ab1-4a14-a5eb-a1f059a5891e.png)
An intriguing mystery: Smoothie or water? Triggering the unknowing coworker

Setting boundaries: Who gets to dictate your food choices?

NTA: Autism texture triggers can be caused by visual stimuli too

Standing up against harassment: NTA, time to involve HR!

Unreasonable request? NTA stands their ground
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://diplycom5cc47.zapwp.com/q:i/r:0/wp:1/w:1/u:https://static.diply.com/c338ab33-357c-4c9f-bf3e-0272183b8db8.png)
NTA. Texture issue, HR should be involved for resolution.

“I have sensory sensitivities and appreciate accommodation. NTA. Talk to HR.”

NTA. Stand up for yourself and go to HR ASAP!

Autistic commenter supports OP’s workplace boundaries, advises contacting HR

Stay home if you can’t handle it. NTA

NTA: Demanding and ridiculous problems, not your responsibility.

NTA. Call HR to share your perspective and avoid future conflicts.

Autistic woman shares perspective on workplace drama. Not the a**hole.

Engaging comment: NTA. Sensory issues or parental coddling?

Questioning the authenticity of sensory sensitivities in the workplace

Stand up for yourself! NTA. Don’t let them control you.

Autistic commenter questions coworker’s authenticity in sensory clash. NTA.

Accommodating allergies: reasonable or problematic?

Stand up for yourself! NTA, go to HR and shut him down!

Addressing unreasonable requests at work? NTA! Go to HR!

NTA, stand your ground! Don’t let this ridiculousness affect you.
