The news that Alabama has voted in favor of a near-total abortion ban is a big deal. Not only does it go against the spirit of a Supreme Court precedent, there's also the fact that men are making the decisions on how to police women's bodies.
The news that Alabama has voted in favor of a near-total abortion ban is a big deal. Not only does it go against the spirit of a Supreme Court precedent, there's also the fact that men are making the decisions on how to police women's bodies.
Abortions were illegal for decades. Women who wanted to seek abortion services were forced to get dangerous illegal abortions.
Before a landmark Supreme Court ruling, the states shown in red did not permit abortions. The only states that gave full access to abortion services are shown in yellow.
This 1973 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that women had the right to seek abortion services in all 50 states. While Supreme Court rulings are generally seen as final, Roe v. Wade is a different kind of ruling.
Criticized by many, abortion laws have been a hot topic political issue in the United States. Generally, opinions fall along political lines: left-leaning politicians favor a woman's right to choose, while right-leaning politicians do not.
Some states have enacted legislation that requires women to undergo a waiting period before getting an abortion, or putting abortion clinics in out-of-the-way places — all designed to circumvent Roe v. Wade.
A recent ruling puts harsh new requirements into place. Women in Alabama may now only get an abortion if their health is in critical danger. They may not seek an abortion, even if the pregnancy is a result of incest or rape.
The controversial bill was signed into law by Governor Kay Ivey, a Republican. While it was Ivey that rubber-stamped the bill, what's truly notable is the lawmakers who voted it in.
All 25 of the votes in favor of the ban came from white Republican men. Only four women serve on the Republican-led Senate. The two who voted both voted against the ban.
The law criminalizes women who are "known to be pregnant". When Senator Linda Coleman-Madison challenged what this means, in a medical context, the senators in favor of the legislation failed to provide an answer.
While the GOP is hands-off with many aspects of healthcare, they're notoriously hands-on when it comes to abortion. And, overwhelmingly, the policy makers in this party are not people who can ever experience a pregnancy.
When Senator Clyde Chambliss couldn't answer Coleman-Madison's question, she said, "I guess that's a typical male answer. You don't know what you don't know, because you've never been pregnant."
It's a charged issue, so let's try to be civil, but what are your thoughts? Do your politics play a part in how you feel about abortion? Let us know in the comments!