Say what you will about Kanye West — and, indeed, there really is a lot that can be said — but he always finds a way to stay in the headlines.
The latest on Yeezus has nothing to do with his bromance with Donald Trump or industry feuds. In fact, it's probably something that nobody saw coming.
Speaking to TMZ last year, Kanye said, "When you hear about slavery for 400 years — for 400 years? That sounds like a choice." Needless to say, it was a controversial take.
He's worth a quarter of a billion dollars and has sold well over 100 million records worldwide, making him one of the biggest stars of all time. It's hard to imagine, but it does seem that he's a bit trapped.
Again, it seems like he should be the one calling the shots. But his record label, EMI, is reportedly the one with the power. It seems that, if they exercised that power, things could get weird for Kanye.
"You (Mr. West) hereby represent and warrant that to [EMI] that You will, throughout the Term as extended by this Modification, remain actively involved in writing, recording and producing Compositions and Major Label Albums, as Your principle occupation."
It states that Kanye, at no time, will seek to retire as a songwriter, recording artist or producer. He's also not allowed to take any kind of hiatus or break.
That sounds a lot like he's literally banned from retiring. Like, because of his contract, a grey-haired Yeezus will be forced to belt out "Gold Digger" for retirees in Vegas in the 2040s.
He launched a lawsuit against EMI in January over his rights and obligations. Not much of the complaint is known, but this new information surrounding his contract helps explain things somewhat.
Basically, they'll have to decide whether the lawsuit is about Kanye's contract (whether he's allowed to retire) or his intellectual property (ownership over his songs). Either way, it could be an ugly fight.
California Labor Code section 2855, otherwise known as the De Havilland Law, prohibits companies like EMI from signing performers to personal service contracts that are seven years or longer.
Other performers, from Olivia Newton-John to Thirty Seconds to Mars, have also had to sue in order to free themselves from contracts they viewed as overly restrictive to their careers.
He wants to get away from EMI, no doubt. A big part of that is that he'd probably like to retire someday. But it's really just the most attention-grabbing complaint in a pretty long list.
He says EMI should not be able to collect any royalties from any of his music released after October of 2010. That's nearly a decade of music, including some career highlights, that he wants the rights to.
We probably won't know many of the details until it's resolved (and even then, we might not). But one thing's for sure: if Kanye isn't granted his freedom from EMI, he's not going to be a happy camper.
His music is critically acclaimed, but even if it isn't your cup of tea, it's a near-certainty that at any given moment, Kanye West is up to something interesting — and usually newsworthy.
