It is no secret that the British tabloids have been incredibly biased and favorable toward Kate Middleton.
But when you put the headlines side-by-side, their unjustified bullying toward Meghan Markle becomes much more undeniable.
It is no secret that the British tabloids have been incredibly biased and favorable toward Kate Middleton.
But when you put the headlines side-by-side, their unjustified bullying toward Meghan Markle becomes much more undeniable.
Can't a girl enjoy her avocado toast in peace? Damn.
When William and Kate opted to spend Christmas with Kate's family instead of The Queen, the tabloids rushed to her defense. But when Meghan and Harry did the same thing this year, it was called "baffling."
But when Harry and Meghan initially broached this approach with their children, the media guilted them for it.
However, when Kate and William did it, publications thought it was an absolutely brilliant idea. When Meghan and Harry did it, it was a "cash in."
And yet, for some reason, while it was totally acceptable for her not to be in attendance for Kate's son's christening, Meghan and Harry were dragged for not arranging Archie's christening to fit The Queen's schedule.
Essentially, Meghan wasn't praised for her style choices because she isn't a "Brit" or "true royalty."
Although Kate was more than welcome to add a fragrance of her choice to her and William's wedding venue, Meghan was refused by the palace for trying to do precisely the same thing.
This publication didn't mention that Kate wasn't wearing a hat in their headline, they simply complimented her outfit. But, of course, they made sure to call out Meghan for it.
It's something most pregnant women do instinctually — including Kate, who was applauded for it. But when Meghan did it, she was accused of exaggerating and being "vain."
SMH.
But Meghan was criticized and accused of doing it "just for a photo op."
I shouldn't have to say this, but it's her body and her baby. She should be able to touch her bump as much as she wants without being slammed for it.
Both were one-shoulder dresses, both looked stunning. Kate's was white, Meghan's was black. Apart from their color, they could have very well been the same dress, and this was the press' response to both.
Although Meghan wasn't following the royal protocol that prohibits sitting cross-legged, outright comparing her to Kate seems totally unnecessary.
It is clear that the British press has some kind of vendetta against Meghan. They shame her for the same things they love Kate for.
When Meghan was photographed with her hands inside the pockets of her dress, she was torn a new one by this publication. But when The Queen posed with her hands in her dress pockets, it was portrayed as being an adorable, forward-thinking style choice.
Meanwhile, they took zero issue with Kate's.
Like this one, that really reached to try to connect Meghan Markle to terrorism suspects through her cookbook. How was this a story?
Attempting to paint Meghan as someone who gleefully associates with criminals and terrorists is a pretty low blow, wouldn't you say?
Not only are these names mean and unnecessary, it's almost equally as mean and unnecessary to compile a list of names for your headline.
There was a lot of scare-mongering headlines written about Meghan's family and life before she was famous, and the use of the phrase "straight outta Compton" was not just a coincidence.
Hopefully, the press eases up on Meghan now that they're out of the spotlight!