Although each U.S. President comes into their role with different policies and values in mind, they're often conscious enough of the conventions of the job and the checks and balances that exist between them, Congress, and the Supreme Court that constitutional crises aren't usually common occurrences.
However, that doesn't mean that legal scholars are wasting time when they debate matters such as how much power a president truly has under the right conditions. Because if someone with a wildly different administrative style comes along, those questions can suddenly become much more relevant.
And the case we'll be discussing today serves as just one example of the value of expecting the unexpected when it comes to these high-level legal matters.