A woman, whose husband's ex-partner is struggling financially, is questioning whether she is in the wrong for not offering financial support. After her husband's income was reduced due to a car accident that left him disabled, the woman covered all expenses and child support payments.
However, when her husband's ex-partner's financial situation became dire, the couple decided they could no longer offer her additional financial support. The ex-partner took them to court, and a judge ruled that the ex-partner must pay child support and insurance reimbursements.
Despite the ruling, the ex-partner's family insists that the woman is at fault for not offering financial support, and they claim that they are facing eviction and repossession of their car.
Read on to see if you think the woman is in the wrong in this situation.
