Hey there, Facebook fam! You know how family drama can sometimes escalate to a boiling point? Well, buckle up, because I’ve got a story for you that’s filled with conflict, emotional turmoil, and a tough decision to make. Our protagonist is a mom who’s been put in a difficult situation after her husband’s sister’s husband (try saying that three times fast! ) purposely tripped her 8-year-old son. The incident led to a no-contact agreement with the sister and her husband, but things take a turn when a family gathering comes into the picture. Should our heroine stick to her guns and keep her infant daughter away from her sister-in-law? Let’s dive into this rollercoaster of a story and find out!
No Contact with SIL and Her Husband

‘That’s What You Get’

Cops Called, No Action Taken

No Baby Meeting Until Apologies

Blocked on Social Media

MIL Brings Up Family Gathering

No Apology from SIL

Text from SIL: ‘Let It Go’

SIL Blames Son and Husband

Husband and MIL on SIL’s Side

♀️ Standing My Ground

Husband Ready to Defend

Sticking to My Decision

Tried Pressing Charges

Husband’s True Stance Revealed

Feeling Betrayed

Divorce Crosses My Mind

No Baby Meeting Until Apologies Are Made
Our story begins with a mom and her husband agreeing to go no contact with her sister-in-law (SIL) and her husband after a nasty incident involving their 8-year-old son. The SIL’s husband purposely tripped the boy, causing him to hit his head, and the cops were called, but no action was taken. The couple agreed that the SIL and her husband wouldn’t meet their soon-to-be-born baby until they apologized and showed remorse. Fast forward to when the baby is almost six months old, and there’s still no apology. Then, the mom’s mother-in-law brings up a family gathering at the SIL’s house, and it’s revealed that the husband has been talking to his sister, who wants to meet the baby. The SIL sends a text that doesn’t include an apology, but rather blames the son and the husband for the incident. The mom decides to stick to her agreement and not let the SIL meet the baby, but her husband and mother-in-law disagree. Now, let’s see what the internet thinks of this situation…
NTA, standing up against abuse and protecting your child

NTA for denying daughter’s violent aunt and uncle.

NTA. SIL needs to take responsibility for tripping your son

Stick to your guns . SIL’s husband intentionally injured a child. NTA .

Protecting your child from violence is not a**hole behavior.

NTA. Their lack of remorse for assaulting your child says everything

Emotional commenter questions husband’s loyalty and parenting abilities.

NTA stands up for safety of children, sparks discussion.

Aunts are not necessary, but principles are!

NTA stands up to abusive in-laws, commenters recognize red flags

NTA. SIL’s husband cracked baby’s head open. No apologies needed

Protecting my child is more important than breaking bread

The husband’s behavior is suspicious. NTA, investigate further.

Heartbreaking situation. In-law’s loyalty to molesters over own nephew.

Passionate response to husband’s irresponsibility and family abuse.

Husband and in-laws suck, plus he’s having secret affair

Passionate comment condemns family’s dangerous behavior towards baby.

Protecting your child from an abusive family member, NTA

Protecting your children is a priority. NTA for maintaining distance.

Heartbroken parent questions family’s disregard for child’s safety.

NTA, stay NC. No apologies accepted. Stand your ground

Tripping an 8-year-old is not acceptable as punishment. NTA.

Parent shares concern over husband’s decision to bring dangerous family around kids

Mama Bear defends her kids against violent family members

NTA. SIL and BIL’s violent actions are unacceptable and alarming. Stay firm.

Protecting your child is more important than protecting abusers.

Strong stance against violence towards children and prioritizing well-being.

Husband’s family abused child, can’t be trusted. Get evidence . NTA

Defend the baby at all costs! NTA

NTA, but the entire family are AHs Child abuse is a deal breaker

NTA commenter expresses concern over child’s safety with violent relatives.

Mother rightfully angry at husband’s apathy towards son’s assault.

NTA calls out breach of trust over family incident.

Protect yourself and your child from potential danger NTA

Husband and MIL are the problem, not the poster. ♀️

Putting your family first. Don’t let toxic relatives in. NTA

NTA. The husband’s family is disrespecting you and hate your son.

Sassy comment suggests revenge on abusive in-laws with desserts

SIL refusing to apologize, NTA. Gaslighting is manipulative behavior.

NTA. Lack of communication and blaming you is not fair.

Screenshots can provide evidence to keep kids safe. NTA

Legal action can protect baby from harmful relatives’ influence.

NTA commenter warns to keep away from emotionally immature adults.

Protecting your child from abuse is top priority. NTA

Defend your child and leave that toxic family.

Urgent advice to report SIL and husband to the police.

The commenter questions why the family is cool with the abuse and advises cutting ties.

Protect your kids from toxic family members. Stand your ground.

NTA commenter questions husband’s values and trustworthiness.

Mother expresses anger towards husband for prioritizing sister over family.

Protecting children from abusive adults is necessary

Protecting the baby from abusive family members. NTA.

Husband’s betrayal of trust caused conflict about family gathering.

NTA but husband needs to stand up for stepson. Good luck!

Protect your cubs ⚖️ Legal action possible against in-laws

NTA stands their ground against an abusive family member.

Use legal help to ensure no contact in custody agreement. NTA

NTA. Husband’s BIL injured child, husband enabling, MIL enabling, terrible situation.

Pressing charges? Looks like the texts sealed their fate!

Fiery comment calling out child abusers and taking OP’s side.

This comment suggests destructive behavior, not a productive solution

NTA, protect your children from danger and toxic family members

Agreement is an agreement. NTA for not making nice.

Heartbreaking family dynamics

NTA for having motherly instincts unlike the husband *cough*

Concerns raised over BIL’s potential to harm other kids

An apology won’t erase intentional harm caused to a child

Husband lied about blocking in-laws, how to trust him again?

Stand up against abuse, even if it’s family.

Protecting your family comes first . Manipulative family members are hard to deal with.

Protecting your child from harm is always NTA

Parental protection is paramount, cut off toxic family members.

NTA commenter suggests humorous revenge on negligent aunt and uncle.

Apologize or no baby visit

NTA! BIL & husband are a******s. What does bio dad think?
