Meet Leslie (24f) and Josh (30m), a couple who’s been dating for a year. Leslie owns a 3-bedroom house, while Josh, a divorced dad with two daughters, rents a 2-bedroom apartment. With Josh’s lease ending soon, they’re considering moving in together. But when Leslie lays down her terms – $700/month in rent, plus splitting utilities and groceries – Josh isn’t happy. He thinks he shouldn’t have to pay rent since it’s her house, and they’re at an impasse. Is Leslie being unreasonable, or is Josh expecting a free ride? Let’s dive into the story!
The Big Move: Planning Ahead
Leslie’s House, Josh’s Rent Dilemma
The Proposal: $700 Rent and Splitting Utilities
Covering the Rest: Leslie’s Offer
Grocery Splitting: Separate Shopping
Josh’s Disagreement: No Rent, Split Groceries ⚖️
Leslie’s Counteroffer: Renting Out Her House
The Stalemate: No Agreement
Rent Prices Skyrocketing
Leslie’s Frustration: $700 vs. $1,800
No Marriage, No Shared Finances
Josh’s Perspective: Income Disparity
Josh’s Argument: For the Kids’ Sake
The Breakup: A Loud and Angry Argument
Leslie’s Final Thoughts: Moving On ♀️
The Breakup: Was Leslie Right or Wrong?
After reading all the comments, Leslie decides to break up with Josh. She’s tired of his expectations and unwillingness to compromise. Despite their love, she knows she can do better than a man who wants to mooch off her and yells at her when she says no. So, is Leslie the bad guy for expecting her boyfriend to pay rent, or is Josh the one who’s out of line? Let’s see what the internet has to say about this dramatic situation!
RELATED STORIES
NTA: Girlfriend sets fair rent, worries about boyfriend mooching off her
NTA, red flag ! Don’t subsidize his and his kids’ lives. Lease it!
NTA – Don’t let him move in without paying rent.
NTA: Girlfriend’s demand for rent sparks debate and red flags
Divorce sentiment suggests NTA. It was definitely not amicable
NTA: Boyfriend’s refusal to contribute to living expenses is unfair.
NTA. He’s getting a bargain and trying to pull shenanigans.
Fair request met with resistance. Boyfriend taking advantage?
NTA – His entitlement is a red flag
Commenter’s success triggers boyfriend’s jealousy and entitlement.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/0ab4479b-be6e-4532-89d7-854881234b65.png)
NTA: Additional people = more wear and tear on house
NTA: Boyfriend wants a sugar mommy to raise his kids
Josh’s frustrations: a**hole or justified? Commenter thinks he’s a baby. ♂️
Commenter defends boyfriend’s financial situation, sarcastically praises girlfriend’s generosity.
NTA – Boyfriend expects rent-free living due to income disparity.
NTA. Fair rent demands, solid counter offer. Win-win or no deal.
NTA. Huge red flag. Girl, run from this argumentative guy!
OP’s boyfriend wants free housing for his kids: a**hole move!
Boyfriend’s entitlement sparks concern. Is this a red flag?
NTA! Josh is a real dumb a**! Get some dogs instead!
NTA: Don’t let him mooch off you, maintain your independence
Dump him now and move on!
Supportive commenter applauds breakup, encourages moving on
NTA’s entitlement and future concerns. Don’t trust his promises.
NTA. Boyfriend’s unrealistic expectations for living expenses are unfair.
Shocking edit reveals unbelievable behavior! Interested in him?
NTA. Comment and reply call out shocking entitlement.
