Imagine the joy of a new baby in the family, a bundle of joy that you can’t wait to share with your loved ones. Now, imagine if your own family members asked you to stop sharing pictures of your little one because they simply don’t want to see kids on their social media feed. This is the dilemma that one couple found themselves in, leading to a family feud that has left everyone questioning: who’s really in the wrong here? Let’s dive into the story…
The Joy of a New Baby

The Family’s Stance on Children

The Request

The Response

Escalating Tensions ⚡

The Wife’s Stand

The Final Decision

The Aftermath

Baby Photos Drama: A Family Torn Apart or Justified Actions? ♀️
In a world where social media connects us, one couple found it to be the source of a family feud. After the birth of their third child, they started sharing baby photos on social media, only to be asked to stop by their child-free relatives. Instead of complying, they decided to block them, leading to an uproar. The couple stands by their decision, but the question remains: were they too harsh or simply standing their ground? Let’s see what the internet has to say about this…
NTA. BIL can unfollow and filter his own social media.

NTA: They could’ve unfollowed instead of being dicks

NTA, blocking relatives over baby photos drama. Share what you want!

NTA. Brother dislikes wife’s baby photos, wants OP to intervene. Drama ensues.

NTA, BIL could have muted your wife’s page

Blocking child-free relatives over baby photos drama? NTA!

“NTA. Let them unfollow or just scroll past your adorable kids “

NTA. Social media drama over baby photos? Seriously, let it go.

NTA: Entitled dude thinks snooze button solves baby photo drama

NTA: Un-friending relatives over baby photo drama
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/4f6bed4f-a990-4d27-b3b6-29323d86b048.png)
NTA. BIL’s rude comment about ‘dealing’ with kids is mean

NTA: Don’t like it, don’t look at it. Just scroll on.

NTA vs Brother: Social Media Drama and Karma Slap!

NTA – Unfollow option exists for a reason

NTA: Don’t like it? Scroll past or change your settings!

NTA, clap back with receipts

BIL asks to not see baby pics, gets blocked. NTA

NTA but also 2 pictures a day is a lot.

NTA. Set boundaries and block them if necessary.

NTA. Family drama over baby photos, what an a**hole brother!

“NTA: Child-free vs. entitled. Remembering kids is too much?”

NTA: Respect their choice to block child-free relatives.

NTA. Don’t let him dictate your family photos. He’s the a**hole.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/41445f2c-75d5-4749-80bb-f7f387242e5b.png)
NTA. BIL can handle it.

NTA for blocking relatives over baby photo drama. Mute function exists.

NTA. Brother should’ve muted or snoozed. Not your problem.

NTA. Request was unreasonable. Don’t dictate others’ posts. Super entitled.
![Image credit: [deleted] | [deleted]](https://static.diply.com/d77b3a13-6f6c-48d5-b6ed-44425f1d7ecf.png)
NTA: Respect their choice to post baby photos on Facebook!

NTA. Creative solution to stop relative from seeing baby pics!

Respecting boundaries: NTA for not sharing baby photos
