This week has been pretty huge for the royal family.
On Monday, the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, gave birth to a baby boy, her first child with husband Prince Harry, and the world pretty much exploded with happiness.
This week has been pretty huge for the royal family.
On Monday, the Duchess of Sussex, Meghan Markle, gave birth to a baby boy, her first child with husband Prince Harry, and the world pretty much exploded with happiness.
Pretty much all anyone's been talking about for weeks has been this baby. When will they be born? Will they be a boy or a girl? What will their name be? Finally we can start getting some answers.
Today the happy parents showed off the newest addition to the royal family and we got our first look at their baby boy.
We're not sure how much more baby joy we can take. They announced the name of their baby boy shortly after, and the world fell in love.
But, one news outlet in particular has recently come under fire for its analysis of the royal baby's mixed-race heritage.
According to The Washington Times, the article was meant to ponder mix-raced 'myths' but quickly outraged people who read the piece and felt writer John Blake had seriously missed the mark.
He wrote about how the news has previously taken mix-raced people and elevated them "to a position of prominence" as "proof of racial progress."
The royal biographer Claudia Joseph told Reuters, “I think this baby is going to be hugely important historically because it’s going to break new ground. Whether it’s a girl or a boy, it will be the first Afro-American baby to be born into the royal family.”
The prevalence of Prince Harry's ginger genes is a more pressing question to some people on Twitter, and they do raise a good point.
He cites Meghan's past comments about her black mother and how she was raised to embrace her "blackness." He also touches on the various ways in which Meghan incorporated her pride into her royal wedding.
"How BLACK?" Pastor Hart Ramsey tweeted in response to the article. "How white is the leadership @CNN?"
Other Twitter users also lamented the article for judging a child "that's not even 3 days old and can't speak and defend themselves."
She slammed CNN for its headline. "CNN needs more people of color working in the executive, decision-making ranks. Obviously," O'Brien wrote and included an image of the article.
Responding to a tweet about the headline, he wrote that anyone who read the entire piece would understand that the analysis was addressing "why classifying a child as X% black is a trap."
Despite clarification, people still aren't happy with Blake's choice of words with one Twitter user directly responding to the CNN writer and saying, "Why does a mixed race person have to be labeled one thing or another? If they want to be just another person like everyone else, let them!"